Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Worldwide derivatives market could be over $1.2 quadrillion in notional value
25 March 2013 | Gaius Publius

Posted on 03/26/2013 9:50:57 PM PDT by Lorianne

We wrote earlier about the recent move by bankers — and the politicians who serve them — to unreform the derivatives market, to return it to its pre–Dodd-Frank, pre–Crash-of-2007 state. This is a serious move by banks and bank lobbyists, and it could well happen soon. The seven bills in the House package of “tweaks” — as the House Agriculture website dishonestly puts it — have cleared the committee with Democratic support and are headed to the House floor. In the meantime, there are companion bills in the Senate.

What will happen in the Senate? Well, Dick Durbin (always an Obama surrogate) famously said of the Senate that “the banks own the place.” And of course the White House has been notoriously bank-friendly since day 1. As a friend told me last week, “Bank lobbyists are good; they really earn their money.” Indeed.

Our earlier story focused on both aspects of this push — the “bad Dems” side and the derivatives side. Let’s now look at just the derivatives aspect.

What is a “derivative”?

While a general definition of a derivative in this context could be — “A financial product derived from another financial product” (for example, a futures contract tied to a stock index) — in practice, the term applies to a whole world of financial products that are written on a one-off basis between two entities called “counterparties,” as opposed to products that are traded on a broad, well-regulated market.

Standard futures contracts are bought and sold on large exchanges, for example, the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT). If I buy a futures contract — for example, I go long (contract or agree to buy in the future) a million bushels of wheat, or barrels of oil, in the expectation that the future price will rise within the time limit of the contract — there will be a counterparty on the short, or selling side, but I have no idea who that is. In fact, in a well-regulated market, the contracts are all standardized; there are thousands of identical contracts in pairs (one on the long or buy side, and one on the short or sell side); and as long as there are the same number of identical contracts on each side, it makes no difference who’s on the other side of my personal contract. The exchange just matches up longs with shorts when they liquidate.

The contracts, as you can see, are created by the exchanges themselves (for example, by the CBOT); they keep the operation orderly; and there are rules, both by the exchanges and by the government, that prevent things (mostly) from running out of control. For example, I can indeed buy futures contracts on millions and millions of barrels of oil for delivery next July (say), and I can put up a tenth of the cost of these contracts, but if the market moves against me, I have to increase my margin (add to my escrow if you will) to protect my counterparties from my inability to pay. The exchange requires that, and if I don’t comply, I’m liquidated (at my expense) and kicked out.

Futures contracts are gambling — I can bet on the Dow to go down or up, for example — but trading in futures contracts is regulated gambling, in which winners are protected from losers, and in many cases, losers protected from themselves.

Not so, derivatives, in the usual meaning of the word. Derivatives in that sense are contracts between parties who want to trade risks, but they aren’t market-traded. They aren’t standardized. And counterparties aren’t vetted by any controlling institution.

In derivatives trading, the counterparties know each other, the contracts are one-off between the parties directly, and the only guarantee that either party will get paid is trust … or the naked belief that they just can’t lose on this one.

AIG wrote billions of dollars of CDS “insurance” against the mortgage market without having even a fraction of what it would take to pay off claims … in the naked belief that they could collect fees forever and never have to pay out once. When the whole thing collapsed, they were wiped out. And because their “insurance” was part of the balance sheet of AIG’s many counterparties (Goldman Sachs and everyone like them), Goldman Sachs would have been wiped out too by AIG’s failure (in effect, by their lies and deception).

That’s why the government bailed out AIG — and insisted on giving them 100 cents on the dollar — so that they could pay off Goldman et al. AIG was bailed out to bail out all their counterparties. (Our discussion of CDSs and their role as bets is here.)

How large is the derivatives market? $1.2 quadrillion in notional value; at least $12 trillion in cash at risk

You read that headine right. By at least one estimate, in 2010 there was a total of $12 trillion in cash tied up (at risk) in derivatives as defined above, all of which controlled contracts connected to assets valued at $1.2 quadrillion.

Here’s how we got those numbers — be sure to differentiate the two values, cash value vs. notional value, as explained below (h/t commenter BeccaM for the link; my emphasis):

Big Risk: $1.2 Quadrillion Derivatives Market Dwarfs World GDP

One of the biggest risks to the world’s financial health is the $1.2 quadrillion derivatives market. It’s complex, it’s unregulated, and it ought to be of concern to world leaders that its notional value is 20 times the size of the world economy. But traders rule the roost — and as much as risk managers and regulators might want to limit that risk, they lack the power or knowledge to do so.A quadrillion is a big number: 1,000 times a trillion. Yet according to one of the world’s leading derivatives experts, Paul Wilmott, who holds a doctorate in applied mathematics from Oxford University (and whose speaking voice sounds eerily like John Lennon’s), $1.2 quadrillion is the so-called notional value of the worldwide derivatives market. To put that in perspective, the world’s annual gross domestic product is between $50 trillion and $60 trillion.To understand the concept of “notional value,” it’s useful to have an example. Let’s say you borrow $1 million to buy an apartment and the interest rate on that loan gets reset every six months. Meanwhile, you turn around and rent that apartment out at a monthly fixed rate. If all your expenses including interest are less than the rent, you make money. But if the interest and expenses get bigger than the rent, you lose.

You might be able to hedge this risk of a spike in interest rates by swapping that variable rate of interest for a fixed one. To do that you’d need to find a counterparty who has an asset with a fixed rate of return who believed that interest rates were going to fall and was willing to swap his fixed rate for your variable one.

The actual cash amount of the interest rates swaps might be 1% of the $1 million debt, while that $1 million is the “notional” amount. Applying that same 1% to the $1.2 quadrillion derivatives market would leave a cash amount of the derivatives market of $12 trillion — far smaller, but still 20% of the world economy.


To trust that lower number ($12 trillion), a lot depends on what’s being traded. In the example above — an “interest rate swap” — what’s being traded (swapped) is the risk of small interest rate changes on the $1 million you borrowed. It’s never the whole $1 million (the notional value).

But with a CDS — a “credit default swap” as discussed here — what’s traded is a fee paid by one side vs. the whole cost of the default paid by the other side. If I as an “insurer” sold a hedge fund a CDS on $20 million in GM bonds, and those bonds default, I’m on the hook for the whole $20 million, the “notional” value.

As a result, I accept the $1.2 quadrillion notional value number. But I think the $12 trillion cash-at-risk number is way low. And “just” $12 trillion is, as they point out, still 20% of world GDP. Stunning.

And don’t forget, these are 2010 numbers. Banks have grown even fatter since then, even greedier, even riskier. And their push to gut the modest regulations put in place by Dodd-Frank declares their intentions to grow. Whatever the size of this market today, expect it to grow like a weed.

Again, House bill HR 992, one of the seven mentioned at the beginning of this piece, is the one that makes you, the taxpayer, even more on the hook for banker-losses than you were after the Dodd-Frank reform. For the banks, the high-priced lobbyists, and their paid, moderately-priced politicians, this is a Win-Win.

But for you, it’s a second trip to Bailout Village. As for the nation … well, I think there’s rebellion in the air if this happens twice. In this case, the hubris of our enemies is not our friend. Not our friend at all.

....


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: derivatives; derivativesmarket
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: mylife

A Quadrillion here a Quadrillion there and pretty soon you are talking big money. :-)


21 posted on 03/27/2013 5:55:51 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; blam; SeekAndFind; All; M. Espinola; moneyrunner; Smokin' Joe; 2ndreconmarine; ...
Bank Of America Dumps $75 Trillion In Derivatives On U.S. Taxpayers With Federal Approval !

LOL !

The whole goovernment is corrupt and on the take for $$$$ Millions from crooked, greedy bankers that own it all.

Welcome to New World Order or NWO where everything is crooked and deeply corrupt

22 posted on 04/19/2013 1:10:56 PM PDT by ex-Texan (The Time to "Wake Up" is Over !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Derivitives are a risk hedge. Essentially you trade a piece of your earning rate for a lower risk. Where the fun starts (and it always seems to ) is when one side starts to weaken one side of the transaction under the assumption that the market will move their way. If it does, BIG MONEY! However, if it moves away from you HUGE LOSSES.

Another factor in all of this is the requirement to mark to market investment assets whether sold or not.This can create big swings in values and destabilize an institution (Ref: Lehman Brothers).

23 posted on 04/19/2013 1:18:13 PM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; blam; SeekAndFind; All; M. Espinola; moneyrunner; Smokin' Joe; 2ndreconmarine
Fed Governor Stein Warns When A TBTF Bank Fails, Depositors Will Be Cyprus'ed

Take a peek down deep and view the graphic representations

"Not to worry:" All our deposits are insured by the FDIC

LOL !

24 posted on 04/20/2013 10:59:57 AM PDT by ex-Texan (The Time to "Wake Up" is Over !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; blam; SeekAndFind; All; M. Espinola; moneyrunner; Smokin' Joe; 2ndreconmarine
How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

With hedge funds trading derivatives by automated computer driven trading. All to be bailed out by taxpayers to the tune of trillions of $$$$$ in our very corrupt political system. LOL !

25 posted on 04/22/2013 10:03:59 AM PDT by ex-Texan (The Time to "Wake Up" is Over !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan

What’s a few trillion among ‘friends’ in the same exclusive club...


26 posted on 04/25/2013 10:58:27 AM PDT by M. Espinola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: M. Espinola; Jack Hammer; Lorianne; blam; SeekAndFind; moneyrunner; Smokin' Joe
Please pass this report along to others who really want to know the truth:

Obama Takeover of Higher Ed Financing Could Bust Taxpayers !

27 posted on 04/26/2013 4:34:49 PM PDT by ex-Texan (The Time to "Wake Up" is Over !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

In Obama’s Gov’t dominated ecoconmy where we let China/Asia take our industries.... In this kind of fake economy what better money to use as a medium of exchange than the Federal Reserves fake money


28 posted on 05/01/2013 10:58:44 AM PDT by dennisw (too much of a good thing is a bad thing - Joe Pine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

So that’s like, what, 1,200 hundred or so trillion dollar coins that the Fed can have stamped out in what, a week? No biggee............\flaming sarc


29 posted on 05/01/2013 11:01:34 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (If govmt is stockpiling guns, ammo, food, & meds, don't you think it's a good idea to do the same?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson