Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spot The Dijsselbloem Gaffes (Template and “Levy On Wealth Is Defendable In Principle”)
Confounded Interest ^ | 03/26/2013 | Anthony B. Sanders

Posted on 03/26/2013 12:52:17 PM PDT by whitedog57

Between youth riots in Cyprus over the tax levy on deposits and the Eurogroup’s Chairman Jeroen Dijsselbloem’s verbal gaffes, it has been a busy day in Europe.

First, the announcement of a deal on Cyprus sent the Euro Stoxx index upwards (resolution of uncertainty). Then Dijsselbloem said that the tax levy on Cyprus deposits was a template for other countries (massive creation of uncertainty). Then he said he wasn't sure what template meant.

First, can you spot when Dijsselbloem made his template gaffe? Second, how could the CEO of the Eurogroup NOT know what a template is?

Then adding gas to the fire, Dijsselbloem says that a levy on wealth is defendable in principle.

While his defense of a levy on wealth was certainly a gaffe, it may be true … and expected.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: cyprus; eurogroup; obama; statism
Yup, they will coming after US deposits next.
1 posted on 03/26/2013 12:52:17 PM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
They wouldn't dare go after Soros' or Buffett's or Bloomberg's wealth, though.

Only the wealth of the little people who can't do anything about it.

2 posted on 03/26/2013 12:54:32 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

There wasn’t even a front page article when that rascal former what’s his name did this and billions were lost. All He said was “I have no idea” Corzine right? They are legally or not stealing while they can and get away with it! Sorry about the grammar. VERY ticked...


3 posted on 03/26/2013 1:02:54 PM PDT by poobear (Socialism in the minds of the elites, is a con-game for the serfs, nothing more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

They HAVE your deposits. They hit ‘em up for a few percent every year - its called “inflation.”

They MIGHT, however, go after your IRAs and 401Ks. Remains to be seen.


4 posted on 03/26/2013 2:23:30 PM PDT by Little Ray (No "Comprehensive" Immigration Reform. Fortifiy the Borders First.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

In Europe bank accounts are insured up to EUR100,000. Smaller accounts are not affected by this action. Amounts over that are not insured. Why should taxpayers bail out a bank before it liquidates uninsured deposits (after stockholder and bondholder interests)? The large account holders knew their deposits were uninsured and at risk. They were lured by jumbo interest rates. There is no lesson to be learned here except to be reminded what lack of insurance can lead to. Here in the US the FDIC insures the first $250,000 of the combined total of your accounts at each insured bank.


5 posted on 03/26/2013 3:54:54 PM PDT by Procyon (Decentralize, degovernmentalize, deregulate, demonopolize, decredentialize, disentitle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson