Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This would be a major step forward, for if this legislation were to pass, then it would most certainly be a defining moment on the abortion issue. Life is given by God and as such should be protected, especially among the most vulnerable among us.
1 posted on 03/20/2013 8:32:36 AM PDT by EXCH54FE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: EXCH54FE

Good going Rand! This will send the abortomaniacs into a frenzy.


2 posted on 03/20/2013 8:37:54 AM PDT by HerrBlucher (Praise to the Lord the Almighty the King of Creation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

On this, I can absolutely agree with Rand Paul.

On his Amnesty plan, absolutely not!


3 posted on 03/20/2013 8:38:42 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

I just hope that somehow, some day, that this man is put on our ticket in 2016. I hope he doesn’t have any demons in his closet and will be able to stand up to the garbage-can searches and intimidation that he’ll be subjected to.


4 posted on 03/20/2013 8:39:09 AM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
Nowadays, with scientific advancement and breakthroughs, anyone who denies that Life Begins At Conception is ANTI-SCIENCE ...

Conception to Birth: Visualized

5 posted on 03/20/2013 8:41:20 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Now THIS. This is what I'm talking about. As a true SoCon, I can get behind a man like this. I may have to overlook some of his liberaltarian viewpoints and his soft-on-immigration policies. But first and foremost - If a person is right on the fundamental issues of abortion, then other values are usually correct as well.


6 posted on 03/20/2013 8:42:11 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

btt


7 posted on 03/20/2013 8:43:06 AM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

Where you at LJ? A little good news for the Moral Absolutes Pinglist.


9 posted on 03/20/2013 8:43:49 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

One thing I appreciate about Paul... at least he’s putting ideas out on the table. Obviously, they aren’t ones we are always going to agree with, but he’s at least putting some brain cells to use. He’s still better than the rest of the herd, IMO.


13 posted on 03/20/2013 8:47:35 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

When does life begin, When one of the parties says “Oh G*D”! :-)!


17 posted on 03/20/2013 8:55:37 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

Rand needs to put a “NO JUDICAL REVIEW” clause in this as well.


18 posted on 03/20/2013 8:56:49 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE; onyx; trisham; TheOldLady; DJ MacWoW; JoeProBono; RedMDer; musicman; Lady Jag; MEG33; ...

Bump for Life!


19 posted on 03/20/2013 8:59:29 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
I don't know why this is not paragraphing for me??? The Supreme Court in Roe vs Wade THE SUPREME COURT RULINGS The Supreme Court’s abortion rulings include four principal elements: 1 The unborn child is a non-person and therefore has no constitutional rights; ================== The only thing that needs to be done to overturn Roe vs Wade is to get them to agree that the unborn baby is a person. Here is a definition of a person according to Webster (I'm sure the left has their own made of definition of person to keep abortion alive) per·son noun \ˈpər-sən\ Definition of PERSON 1 human, individual —sometimes used in combination especially by those who prefer to avoid man in compounds applicable to both sexes. 2 a character or part in or as if in a play : guise 3 a:one of the three modes of being in the Trinitarian Godhead as understood by Christians b : the unitary personality of Christ that unites the divine and human natures 4 a archaic : bodily appearance b the body of a human being; also : the body and clothing 5 the personality of a human being : self 6 one (as a human being, a partnership, or a corporation) that is recognized by law as the subject of rights and duties 7 reference of a segment of discourse to the speaker, to one spoken to, or to one spoken of as indicated by means of certain pronouns or in many languages by verb inflection So, with today technology we should be able to overturn it. The problem we face is thinking like Peter Singer of Princeton who says humans must be self-aware He thinks parents should be allowed to abort (kill) a child up to approximately 2 years or when a doctor decides they are self-aware. SICK, I know.
20 posted on 03/20/2013 9:01:33 AM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

I think abortion should mostly be illegal, but if life begins at conception, is a fertilized egg in a test tube a human life?

If a nurse drops the test tube, is that manslaughter?

If a mother has a fetus with no head, should she be forced to deliver it?


23 posted on 03/20/2013 9:10:21 AM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
This is basically the same bill his father and others always put out, Sanctity of Life Act, that was never supported by other Republicans.
25 posted on 03/20/2013 9:11:50 AM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE
Life At Conception Act Introduced By Senator Rand Paul

Now how about the American Taxpay Relief act of 2013, lowing our taxes to 14.5% and no double taxation on dividends??

28 posted on 03/20/2013 9:14:14 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (More Republicans stayed home then the margin of victory of O's Win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

> Nothing in this Act shall be construed to require the prosecution of any woman for the death of her unborn child.

I’m not sure that disclaimer would be enough to bring many women voters on board. I think the major step forward would be getting the votes for such bills, not creating them.


34 posted on 03/20/2013 9:43:18 AM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

Bump.


36 posted on 03/20/2013 9:48:53 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

But but but... he’s a libertarian. /s


40 posted on 03/20/2013 10:13:09 AM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

We sure don’t need a libertarian like him running for President!


41 posted on 03/20/2013 10:22:29 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EXCH54FE

Sounds good, but why does Rand Paul have a 33% rating from Planned Parenthood?

“KY U.S. Senate Jr Rand Paul Republican 33”
snip http://votesmart.org/interest-group/1578/rating/6093


50 posted on 03/20/2013 11:22:39 AM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson