Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: stormer
Ha! I guessed!

Yes it is science itself which has disproved the idea that dinosaurs are millions of years old with a single test. Otherwise soft tissue can last millions of years. Do you think soft tissue can last millions of years? I don't. I think it's much more likely that dinosaurs aren't millions of years old at all. Either way, science was wrong. So now the latest scientific discoveries have proved that what scientists have been teaching about the dinosaurs is completely wrong, just like when the idea of a heliocentric solar system replaced the earlier scientific theory of the geocentric Ptolemaic system. Those who cling to outdated and discredited theories such as the theory of evolution are like those who would not accept the evidence that the Earth revolved around the sun. People who "believe" science don't understand science, they just trust that the scientists must know what they are talking about. That's not too smart. People who think for themselves are skeptical and question everything.

66 posted on 03/17/2013 11:45:08 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Tailgunner Joe
So you in your wisdom, and having determined through no means other than personal disbelief, think soft tissue can't last millions of years. And with this you are willing to proclaim that people who have dedicated their lives to the study of paleontology over the last two centuries are all completely wrong. Professional scientists who “cling to outdated and discredited theories” simply don't have the intellectual heft that you bring to the argument on the realities of prehistory. Any other science you care to debunk? After all, an expert like yourself has probably tackled all sorts of topics that have mystified those ignorant rubes that spend their lives hanging around laboratories.
68 posted on 03/18/2013 12:05:45 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
And there's one more thing I have to ask: Do you have any idea whatsoever about the demineralization process used to extract soft tissue from fossils? You know they didn't just crack open a bone and pull out some marrow, don't you? Are you familiar at all with the arguments made indicating that the soft tissue recovered may not have originated with the fossils themselves? Do you even care, or is anything that supports your preconceived notions going to garner your full throated, expert take?
69 posted on 03/18/2013 12:16:59 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson