[stormer]

And there's one more thing I have to ask: Do you have any idea whatsoever about the demineralization process used to extract soft tissue from fossils? You know they didn't just crack open a bone and pull out some marrow, don't you? Are you familiar at all with the arguments made indicating that the soft tissue recovered may not have originated with the fossils themselves? Do you even care, or is anything that supports your preconceived notions going to garner your full throated, expert take?

[Tailgunner Joe]

Oh so you DON”T think tissue can last millions of years then? That’s good, because that would be pretty funny if you actually believed that.

[Tailgunner Joe]

Here's scientific evidence that the soft tissue is indeed dinosaur tissue: Molecular Analysis Supports Controversial Claim for Dinosaur Cells - “Here’s the data in support of a biofilm origin,” Schweitzer said in her presentation as she showed a blank slide. “We haven’t found any yet.”

No evidence supports the argument that the tissue is not dinosaur tissue. Do you care? Or will you in your wisdom reject anything that challenges your preconceived guesses based on nothing but your own personal disbelief?