Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30; napscoordinator

“As a non-Catholic, I would prefer the KJV. :)”

I rather like the 1611 Edition of KJ...it includes ALL of the Books of the Bible (includes the deuterocanonical books) ...

...and one of the most accurate translations, in my opinion, is the Jerusalem Bible, an English-language translation of the Bible which first was introduced to the English-speaking public in 1966 and published by Darton, Longman & Todd. It of course includes the deuterocanonical books.


60 posted on 03/16/2013 8:33:56 AM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: GGpaX4DumpedTea; Jonty30; napscoordinator

This Protestant prefers the 1985 “New Jerusalem Bible” and the 1995 edition of Zonderman’s “NIV Study Bible.” But for reading as lectionary, I often preferthe King James version.

And an occassional dip into “The Message” new testament by Peterson


62 posted on 03/16/2013 8:42:52 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson