Jonty30 replies to the ‘nitpickers’ quite clearly: It may not be completely legit, but it’s teaching people who have absolutely no knowledge of the Word or God.
Additionally, I view this series as offering water to a man dying of thirst. Those who reject it because of “you’re not using the proper type of glass for serving water” mentality are willing to deny the Word of God to those who only know how it is misrepresented.
Pope Francis just spoke about that didn’t he. Amazing ~ first thing on his mind ~ which means ~ he’s interested in evangelization. We can discuss the details of his motives later.
The “History” Channel is far from a good or reliable source for the word of God. As for your thirst analogy you should substitute poisened water for the “improper container”.I ignore the “History” Channel because I can't rely upon what they air as truth. Too many times I have seen leftist propaganda paraded as fact. As it is your last sentence quoted above makes no sense that I can see but misrepresenting The Word of God AT ALL is an unimaginable sin. Whether this was actually done in the production in question I neither know nor care, as, as i have said, the source is beneath consideration in the first place.