[TalBlack]

“Additionally, I view this series as offering water to a man dying of thirst. Those who reject it because of “you’re not using the proper type of glass for serving water” mentality are willing to deny the Word of God to those who only know how it is misrepresented.”

The “History” Channel is far from a good or reliable source for the word of God. As for your thirst analogy you should substitute poisened water for the “improper container”.I ignore the “History” Channel because I can't rely upon what they air as truth. Too many times I have seen leftist propaganda paraded as fact. As it is your last sentence quoted above makes no sense that I can see but misrepresenting The Word of God AT ALL is an unimaginable sin. Whether this was actually done in the production in question I neither know nor care, as, as i have said, the source is beneath consideration in the first place.

[muawiyah]

history channel is broadcasting what seems to be an independent production. this is no more troublesome than using the oprah channel, or maybe msnbc ~ after all, they have nothing worthwhile on that channel.

In a different venue there's a basketball game on in a tournament ~ and they are going into their SECOND OVERTIME!!!

Zowie!!!