Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie; kristinn; IBD editorial writer; WashingtonSource; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; ...

SoConPubbie:

Thanks for your reply, and compliment. Visit me at “In Forum” anytime, to chuckle at this old graewoulf.
#:o)

__________________

ALL:

What follows is a long-winded background on why I think that:

1.) it is nearly impossible for a Republican Politician to win a Presidential Election when the Liberal Agenda Media chooses to oppose all good done and promote ANY bad done by that same Republican Politician;

2.) We Conservatives unwittingly tend to mimic the attack style of the Liberal Agenda Media.

I have watched the Liberals deflect the facts of an assertion, and it goes something like this:

Anchor: “RINO A made the statement yesterday that Democrat A supports more Federal Spending on Program Party-Time. What is your opinion, Democrat A, on spending more taxpayer dollars when so many Americans are without jobs?”

[ Note: The low information voter will only pick out topics that he/she is interested in, and ignore the rest as “just politics as usual.” ]

[ Note: Democrats know that the average human can only focus on 3 topics, and thus tries to add at least 3 variables to each topic, plus add at least 3 more new topics. Thus, with each facetime answer the opportunity is to keep on adding variables, anecdotes, and new topics. The over riding rule is to repeat the MAIN LIES as convincingly and as often as possible before the commercial break. ]

(Back to the studio): Democrat A: “ Well, I want to thank my good BIPARTISAN friend Republican A for choosing to raise this important issue to the attention of THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

“This INVESTMENT in the goodwill and happiness of the HARDWORKING Federal WORKERS in these HARD TIMES who have devoted their lives to living a continuous life of Party Time are providing a unique service our GREAT NATION’S TEACHERS, STUDENTS, and especially to those what have been thrown out of work by the RECKLESS POLICIES of the PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION.

“Of course, there will always be a few that will say that it was not BUSH’S FAULT, but most REASONABLE people will AGREE that people who say that it was not BUSH’S FAULT are known to be on the EXTREME end of a dying Conservative culture of FAILURE, after FAILURE, after FAILURE.

“One has only to look at the recent Presidential elections to determine THE AMERICAN PEOPLE know that this worst economy since THE GREAT DEPRESSION was ALL BUSH’S FAULT.”

______________

Etc, etc, etc. You can count the new variables and new topics for yourself, but the point is that when the low information voter surfs to the next channel at the commercial break, he/she is only thinking about how much he/she hates Bush, how they agree with the American People, and who does RINO A, a good bipartisan friend of smiling Democrat A, think he is to deny spending somebody else’s tax dollars on Federal Program Party Time!

__________

Compare the above to ANY RINO who scares the “h e double toothpicks” out of a Liberal “Bipartisan” Federal Politician, and get your hip boots on because the offending RINO’s blood will be spilled very quickly.

Dan Greenfield did it with his false assumption article.

Ultra Left-Wing GOP Elite Pig McCain did it on the Senate floor as did fellow Left Wing GOP Elite Pig Graham.

The Liberal Agenda Media will play endless clips of Rand saying and voting for things that show Rand in a bad light.

All of this will be repeated until the chatter is no longer about the Filibuster, or what the Filibuster achieved, but what THE AMERICAN PEOPLE found to be the most shameful, repulsive and distasteful about anything that Rand has ever said or done.

__________

This is an old pattern for the Liberal Agenda Media, (LAM).

Back in the day, GWH Bush’s Veep was given a slip of paper with the word potato on it in the question that the school wanted him to ask. The Veep asked the question, and then corrected the student to the spelling on his slip of paper. [ Note: both spellings were correct.]

In a matter of weeks, when the LAM was through with the Veep Quayle, his future political career was over.

In contrast, Indonesian Citizen, Communist, Tyrant, financially incompetent, Benghazi-Coward B. Hussein Obama slept peacefully while his Libyan Federal Personnel were being butchered for 7 hours: with nary a peep out of the Liberal Agenda Media.


69 posted on 03/09/2013 11:59:43 PM PST by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Commune Obama"care" violates Anti-Trust Laws, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Graewoulf
2.) We Conservatives unwittingly tend to mimic the attack style of the Liberal Agenda Media.

That one irritates me most.
72 posted on 03/10/2013 4:50:20 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf
2.) We Conservatives unwittingly tend to mimic the attack style of the Liberal Agenda Media.

Graewoulf,

The problem is, where do we draw the line with those who Want us to believe they are conservative, but truly, are not?

Is it Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, John McCain, or Mitt Romney?

All of these people have shown by their words a propensity, at some level, to try and manipulate the public perception of themselves that they are acceptable conservatives, while espousing views that are directly opposed to main-stream conservative thought.

Whether it be, approval or a desire to implement Comprehensive Immigration Reform (just code-words for Amnesty as any clear-thinking conservative knows), Acceptance and/or support for any part of the Gay Agenda, acceptance and/or support of any part of Abortion, refusal to take the concept of limited and smaller government (Constitutional Government) seriously and enact it.

So where do we, as serious conservatives, draw the line?
78 posted on 03/10/2013 6:08:10 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf; RaceBannon

“Reagan said that conservatism is a three legged stool. Social, fiscal and national defense. Either we have all three. Or we have nothing.” - Daniel Greenfield

Rand Paul has the fiscal part, but on social and defense his legs are very wobbly.


94 posted on 03/10/2013 10:38:46 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: Graewoulf

Fake Republican Pig Rand Paul — see, that works too.

He’s a RINO, and a CINO.


109 posted on 03/11/2013 4:53:58 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: upchuck

PING.


119 posted on 03/11/2013 8:07:19 AM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Commune Obama"care" violates Anti-Trust Laws, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson