She’s a woman who recognizes what is at stake and is frantic to do something about it. Unfortunately, she is overcommitted so she is botching the process and that does hurt the cause. Part of that is probably because she knows that if you put all your eggs in one basket, that basket can very easily be targeted by the all-powerful fox and the eggs eaten up. That’s what happens when people who should be HELPING regain the rule of law instead aid and abet the fox by ridiculing those who bring forward the evidence.
I don’t answer for what Taitz has done. I only answer for what *I* have done. And there are a lot of people who will need to answer for what they have done.
What she recognizes is the ability to get attention. If she truly sought a remedy through the courts, she would not have rejected the help of competent attorneys in the beginning. Now they won’t touch her and I don’t blame them.
Yeah, she’s over-committed all right ... over-committed to seeking attention. She needs to be committed ... to a mental institution. It’s all about Orly. I can’t count the number of times she’s misinterpreted simple judicial procedure as a win or progress.
“I will get Obama’s deposition 30 days from now.”
“The judge agreed with me.”
“The court agreed to hear my case on the merits.”
“Look at me! Look at me! I don’t know what the hell I’m doing but keep looking!”
Incompetent, lunatic, attention-whore.
As for you? I think you have good intentions. I also think you have stated as fact that which is conjecture. We agree to disagree on a few things. I suspect Orly Taitz is one of them.