>>Well are you for conservatives or not?? Make up your mind. How can you support Cruz but at the same time berate me for wanting to ditch Brown??<<
There ya go. Cruz isn’t Conservative enough for you. Tea Party candidate? N/I (Not Important). Went on record and on Sunday shows as saying Texas will NEVER give in on 2A and 10A — N/I.
Reagan could not meet today’s CNSRVTV ENUF test. FR’s FOUNDER couldn’t meet that test.
Keep moving them goalposts and sooner than later you’ll have that fascist state your perfection demands (be avoidance).
“There ya go. Cruz isn’t Conservative enough for you. Tea Party candidate? N/I (Not Important). Went on record and on Sunday shows as saying Texas will NEVER give in on 2A and 10A — N/I.”
Well you’re clearly misunderstanding me. I was very happy Cruz won. I love him. He fignts and doesn’t back down. He doesn’t get all moderate and weasily when sitting next to Chuck Schumer.
And I’m not moving any goalposts. I want the most conservative person possible nominated in every election. I’m not interested in who the establishment thinks “can win.” The establishment continually supports, by either habit or deliberate intent, the more moderate nominee. Specter over Toomey, Crist over Rubio, Lugar over Mourdock, Dewhurst over Cruz, Bennet over Lee, Murkowski over Miller.
Personally, I think they do this intentionally to piss off and demoralize conservatives (as with Romney). But we’re not giving up. Eventually, they’ll get the message that if they really want their candidates to win, then they’ll have to start supporting conservatives or their moderate choices will lose. But in reality, I don’t think they want victory after victory. They know conservatives win so they do evertything to defeat them. They want people they can control to get elected. And Cruz, DeMint etc. don’t play ball the way a Scott Brown would.