She is arguing that if she had a gun she might lose her battle with depression and kill herself. I heard a similar argument once from an anti-gun college professor ... he said that if he had a gun he would have killed someone by now.
Since liberals have diminished self-control, and as the primary social dynamic of liberalism is projection of their own mental/emotional dynamics onto others, no one should own a gun. They can’t control themselves, therefore you cannot control yourself, therefore you should not own a gun.
Makes sense ... in La La land ...
So their claim is that with free access to guns, there would be fewer stupid liberals, yet they then go on to use that as an argument FOR gun control??? Hmmmmm, strange....
I guess she never heard of the one thing that will always be there should people decide to commit Suicide, GRAVITY.
Even Pharaoh Obama cannot outlaw that.
Why would you need a gun to kill yourself? Most women don’t do it like that anyway. Is there a shortage of pills, tall buildings, and bridges where she lives?
And, when you consider that all the mass shooters possessed characteristics of the typical Liberal, it all makes sense...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2979881/posts
How about this...if you’re registered Democrat, you don’t get any guns?