Posted on 01/13/2013 9:59:43 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Obama WANTS insurrection..... AND sadly WILL HAVE IT...
You have the right to remain silent.
I doubt the real Anonymous would use the politically incorrect word, “crazy.”
Anonymous has outed himself. He’s Captain Obvious!
>> He’s been reading FR!
He?
What else might you want us to say out loud?
That we’ve had enough?
That we have no desire to be bullied?
That we don’t wish to see blood in the streets?
That we don’t want our children to be brainwashed...by anyone?
That when you pick a fight with innocent people, beware of righteous anger?
That enemies of freedom are enemies of all humanity?
That enemies of G-d forfeit their right to G-d’s protection?
Why do you want to hear us say it out loud?
Who is listening?
Anonymous does not forgive
Anonymous does not forget
Anonymous is Scot-Irish /s
There’s going to be a lot of good people who die trying to enact a gun grab. Unfortunately, these people will only be doing their job as directed. Then, thre are those LEO’s who will walk away and become the public gun owners. Personally, I truely hope it never comes to that but I wouldn’t put anything past Odumbo and his ilk.
Why are you assuming people use logic?
And after the fact, they will say;
“We were just following orders.”
If they're trying to enact a gun grab they're not good people.
Anyone, any group, or any association who assists in the confiscation of guns is engaged in a act of tyranny and our founding fathers instructed us as to our course of action regarding a tyrannical government.
It is not me saying this, read Patrick Henry, Washington, Jefferson, Madison, etc.
Anonymous is no friend of America, conservatives, or gun owners. Ulterior motives suspected.
unless i am mising something, i would disagree that it’s not rhetorically airtight under your explanation.
if your equation was true, that would also mean no guns for anyone, including police, alphabet soup folks, and the military and secret service. and that will not happen. unless you’re assuming the blatant hypocrisy won’t be picked up on by anyone. which it already has.
i never did assume these people use logic, i said it’s not logically possible to equate law abiding people with criminal whackjobs. you can see my statement would reject gun grabbers as being logical because they do equate law abiding people the same as criminals murderer maniacs - ie “the problem” that will be solved by taking their guns away.
besides anyone who looks at all the gun laws and restricted zones for carry and sees what criminals are’doing now, if they think the solution is “more laws”, is insane and intent on eradicating law abiding folks’ gun rights.
That would be my position, too, i.e. that they are illogival. But then I wouldn’t bring it up in the first place because logic is in such shirt supply everywhere you go, including university philosophy departments. It would be like pointing out that libs are vertibrates or that they walk erect.
Haven’t heard of any computer hackers being girls...yet! ;)
Looks like ANON followers are busy...
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/gene-rosen-sandy-hook-conspiracy-155033813.html
Man who helped Sandy Hook kids is harassed by conspiracy theorists
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.