Posted on 01/13/2013 8:38:15 PM PST by null and void
Guide to Personal 3D Printers
3D Systems Cube 3D There is an emerging new category in the gadget world. The products are called 3D printers and although still evolving, they are becoming relatively affordable and quite workable. The term and the idea of a personal 3D printer came from the work of two MIT grad students who in 1995 modified an inkjet printer to deposit layers of plastic in a process sometimes referred to as additive manufacturing. RepRap was also early on the 3D printer scene with an open source 3D printer project that helped inspire an early 3D printer from MakerBot called the Cupcake CNC machine. The Cupcake has since evolved into the high quality, $2,000 Replicator 2, 3D printer. Although there are many different varieties of 3D printers ranging in price from hundreds of dollars to tens of thousands of dollars, were going to look at what goes into the more affordable versions.
Note: Be sure and check out our roundup of affordable 3D printers. |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
If the printers used wax instead of plastic, it would be useful for the lost wax method of casting. Are there any that do use wax?
>> Are there any that do use wax?
Yes. Google it. Also videos on youtube.
Clicked post too soon. Just Google on: wax 3d printer
Very informative, I may buy two different types, one that does small objects cheaply and another large enough for some particular pieces of equipment in short supply nationally.
You may add me to your ping list.
Communists will hate this, it takes their control completely away.
Thanks. That was an interesting subject. I didn’t take long enough to research prices for the more professional models since this is pie in the sky stuff for me anyway.
The same thing will happen with feedstock for these 3D printers, rendering any output uneconomical. Better encourage an open source means of providing usable plastics. The green angle might be of some use even if its a sort of subterfuge.
This will have the effect of preventing the price of the 3D printer unit itself from falling to really accessible, cheap levels, but that itself would be a subterfuge as it is with computer printers. Or cell phones, for that matter.
Or, as the original post says...
Recycle Old Plastic Bottles Into Filament
There are people working on ways to lower the cost of filament using do-it-yourself extruders like the Filabot that can make filament out of recyclable plastics. Imagine grinding up an old soda bottle and feeding it into your own extruder to produce a 3D model.
The list seems quite limited:
http://store.qu-bd.com/category.php?id_category=13
These QU-BD printers are certainly within the price range the article purports to cover, but were left out.
This firm’s approach is of most interest to me because they are planning to introduce a 3D printer based on the technology base above, but which can be retrofitted with a CNC milling cutter head which seems QUITE powerful.
The combined unit (additive plastic extruder) plus milling cutter head is slightly over the $2K cutoff for the article, but the “additive only” model is <$1500, with larger print area than the above linked additive units.
Already being done.
EVEN IF it's a subterfuge?? Get something you need while screwing the green weenies? Sound like winning the, er, double crown to me.
Anything Commies hate, HAS to be good!
Added.
You’re added too.
I may.
(I did)...
The first 4-banger electronic pocket calculators were over $100. Give it time.
Yes, There was an excellent article in a publication that doesn't allow FR postings. I can't find it at the moment, but when I get back this evening I'll see if I can at least get you a link.
My dad bought a Texas Instruments simple calculator for his office to use in the early 70s. It was $300. Several years later, he saw the same one hanging by the checkout counter at the grocery store for $8. My current one is clear plastic, solar powered, has more functions, and was $1.
I think I paid $350 for my first. It did "slightly" more than four functions (I think it could do squares and roots, and maybe even natural logarithms and exponentials). Paid for itself in speeding up number-crunching for my dissertation data. Even at that, it was way cheaper than the Hewlett Packards that came out somewhat earlier.
But my point had nothing to do with how much the printer(s)cost......just the fact that some appear to have been left out of the review, and adding it to the thread.
I think the idea of having a unit that will do both additive 3D AND milling is quite an innovative approach that makes excellent sense.
\ I'm going to try to convince my business partners to spring for one.....if not, I'll probably spring for one for myself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.