It’s absolutely a legal issue. He is LEGALLY REQUIRED TO VERIFY ANYTHING HE CAN. This is absolutely a legal issue. If he didn’t verify it, it’s because he CAN’T, because the record is legally non-valid. And that changes EVERYTHING, because it means Obama has no legally-determined birth facts - and given the suspect nature of his BC in Hawaii, the burden of proof falls on him and it is legally presumed that the claims are NOT TRUE.
Legally, this changes everything. It means that he is behind by 40-0; stalling is supposed to mean that he automatically loses. Totally different ballgame than him being legally ahead by 40-0 and stalling. The legal presumption at this point is that there is not compelling legal evidence for a Hawaii birth.
It's possible that there is a remaining burden of proof. There is a paper artifact in HI to which they are referring. We do not completely know what is on it. But enough of the essential info has been verified to say there is a piece of 1961 paper saying Obama was born there. It may have contrary info on it or a stamp on top of it saying invalid or other possibilities. But the paper exists, was photocopied, sealed, delivered, scanned at the WH, manipulated and released.