Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama would be limited in executive order on gun control
Examiner ^ | January 9, 2013 | Ryan Witt

Posted on 01/09/2013 4:49:23 PM PST by QT3.14

Today Vice President Joe Biden met with gun victims and safety groups as part of a continuing effort by his task force to come up with solutions to gun violence in the aftermath of the Newtown, Connecticut shootings. The highlight of the meeting came when Biden announced that the White House is prepared to act through executive action to implement gun control measures. Biden stated...

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; eo; executiveorder; guncontrol; obama; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: QT3.14
Here's the clip of Biden saying Obama will use Executive Orders.
21 posted on 01/09/2013 6:04:15 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Limited my a**. He can’t pass any EXO that restricts or infringes on the rights of citizens to keep and bear arms. Only and amendment to the constitution can do that. If the house doesn’t call him on any EXO he tries to shove down our throats they need to be kicked pronto. Can’t depend on Roberts to uphold the constitution if it comes to that.


22 posted on 01/09/2013 6:06:34 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DangerZone
You stated: “That hasn't stopped anti-gun laws from being passed and forced for decades,. . . “

That is because the left used “felon's in possession” as the reason de jure for gun control and almost every American supported it since the left was leaving them alone.

Now the left gun grabbers are knocking on the door of every American; convicted felon or not, now it is a problem and the new laws need to be beaten back.

I tried to get people to fight against all gun control efforts but was unsuccessful. the excuse was “we don't want convicted felons in possession of firearms!” or “we need some reasonable gun control laws!” Well, if everyone would understand, the socialist gun control is NOT about crime prevention, or gun safety, but, instead to disarm the American people period, maybe now everyone will unite to fight these dirty socialist on EVERY legislative gun control effort!

23 posted on 01/09/2013 6:13:45 PM PST by paratrooper82 (82nd ABN Div. 1/508th BN "Fiery From the Sky")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Unfortunately all ours were lost in a tragic mishap when our boat was swamped.

What a coinki dink.....I too lost all my firearms in a tragic canoe capsizing, on a lake in Manitoba (I think, it was such a traumatic experience the my mind is jello,jello...

24 posted on 01/09/2013 6:14:45 PM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

This dictator recognizes no limits. The argument is moot.


25 posted on 01/09/2013 6:15:56 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Storm the Bastille?

One of those cell phone flash things?

Desperate times, desperate measures.

Besides, the Attorney General did that very thing in college.


26 posted on 01/09/2013 6:34:23 PM PST by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

The kenyan must know that whatever action he’s planning would have no chance getting through even the weak kneed congress, so like any DICTATOR would, he plans to issue an edict! I don’t know about anyone else, but 0bama IS NOT MY MASTER!


27 posted on 01/09/2013 6:35:56 PM PST by 21st Century Crusader (August 26, 1191)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens, according to statistics released by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa. If those numbers are correct, it translates to 4,380 Americans murdered annually by illegal aliens.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2006/11/39031/#LEASzzXP0jXjETVw.99

So every two days illegals create a Newtown. When does the deportation begin?


28 posted on 01/09/2013 6:55:09 PM PST by doug from upland (Obama and the leftists - destroying our country one day at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

One day I’m going to go trawling the lakes and streams of this country. The sheer volume of gold and guns I will find there will make me a multimillionaire.


29 posted on 01/09/2013 6:58:02 PM PST by garbanzo (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: null and void
"Oh? Who exactly is going to limit him?"

The answer to that is in case law, and the citation and quote are behind the link to the article.


30 posted on 01/09/2013 7:12:08 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void

It’s not “who” but rather, what.


31 posted on 01/09/2013 7:12:58 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyop

“The law? What do I care about law? Ain’t I got the power?” - Cornelius Vanderbilt.


32 posted on 01/09/2013 7:28:55 PM PST by null and void (Avg # victims per incident, if shooter stopped by armed civilian: 3, if stopped by a policeman: 14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

Omammy shall not “abridge the right to keep and bear arms”. That means he has no power at all on our guns. We are not registering and he can go to burning Hades.The reason for this freedom which was a high priority in out CONSTITUTION. was to be able to combat TYRANNY from our government!!!


33 posted on 01/09/2013 7:44:43 PM PST by willardwx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Robert357

You are correct in that Obastard will be limited in what he can do. Whatever it is, it will still have to be within the law and the Constitution or the EO will be rapidly overturned. As much as Obastard hates to admit it, he can’t simply create a law declaring the AR-15 to be a Class 3 weapon and force everyone to register them as such.


34 posted on 01/09/2013 7:54:53 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The one thing that Hollywood gets right about guns is that crminals will always get them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DangerZone

well it will have to come down to the wire if they attempt to take peoples’ guns. they’ll have no choice but to decide what they will do.


35 posted on 01/09/2013 9:14:38 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

He can order whatever he wants. He’s the Executive.
If anyone objects, he can tie it up in court for years regardless of inevitable outcome.


36 posted on 01/09/2013 9:16:43 PM PST by ctdonath2 (End of debate. Your move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Oh? Who exactly is going to limit him?

Sure can't get a clue from the two sentence excerpt...

37 posted on 01/09/2013 9:20:28 PM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Very true.

Article 1 of the Constitution establishes that "the Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it" -- but does not specify which authority has the jurisdiction to decide on the exceptional suspension.

Another passage of Article 1 declares that the power to declare war and to raise and support the army and navy rests with Congress, BUT Article 2 states that "the President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States."

Let's just look at a few precedents:

During the Civil War (1861–1865), Lincoln acted counter to the text of Article 1 (on April 15, 1861) by proclaiming that an army of seventy-five thousand men was to be raised and convened a special session of Congress for July 4. In the ten weeks that passed between April 15 and July 4, Lincoln acted de facto as a total dictator. On April 27, Lincoln authorized the General in Chief of the Army to suspend the writ of Habeas Corpus whenever he deemed it necessary along the military line between Washington and Philadelphia. Furthermore, on February 1862, Lincoln imposed censorship of the mail and authorized the arrest and detention in military prisons of persons suspected of "disloyal and treasonable practices".

Image 1648

In the speech he delivered to Congress July 4 1861, President Lincoln justified his actions as the holder of a supreme power to violate the Constitution in a situation of necessity:

"Whether strictly legal or not, [the measures he had adopted had been taken] under what appeared to be a popular demand and a public necessity" in the certainty that Congress would ratify them. Those exceptional measures were based on the conviction that even fundamental, natural law could be violated IF the very existence of the union and the juridical order were at stake:

"Are all the laws but one to go unexecuted, and the Government itself go to pieces lest that one be violated?"

--Lincoln

Although Congress was aware that the constitutional jurisdictions had been transgressed, it could do nothing but ratify the actions of the President, as it did on August 6, 1861. Strengthened by this approval, Lincoln proclaimed on September the emancipation of the slaves on his authority alone and later generalized the state of emergency throughout the entire territory of the United States, authorizing the arrest and trial before courts martial of "all Rebels and Insurgents, their aiders and abettors within the United States, and all persons discouraging volunteer enlistments, resisting militia drafts, or guilty of any disloyal practice, affording aid and comfort to Rebels against the authority of the United States."

***

During World War One President Wilson assumed broader powers than those Lincoln had claimed. However, instead of ignoring Congress, as Lincoln had done, Wilson had those extraordinary powers delegated to him by Congress. Instead of declaring a state of emergency, he had exceptional laws issued. From 1917 to 1918, Congress approved a series of acts (from the Espionage Act of 1917 to the Departmental Reorganization Act of 1918) that granted the President COMPLETE CONTROL over the administration of the United States and not only prohibited disloyal activities (such as collaboration with the enemy and the diffusion of false reports), but even made it a crime to "willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States" (from the Sedition Act of 1918).

***

Since the power of the President is grounded in the emergency linked to a state of war, the metaphor of war became a part of the presidential vocabulary whenever decisions considered to be of vital importance are being imposed.

In 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt was able to assume extraordinary powers by presenting his actions as those of a Commander in Chief during a military campaign:

"I assume unhesitatingly the leadership of this great army of our people dedicated to a disciplined attack upon our common problems.…I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken Nation in the midst of a stricken world may require.…But in the event that the Congress shall fail to take [the necessary measures] and in the event that the national emergency is still critical, I shall not evade the clear course of duty that will then confront me. I shall ask the Congress for the one remaining instrument to meet the crisis—broad Executive power to wage war against the emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in fact invaded by a foreign foe."

--Franklin D. Roosevelt, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1933

From the constitutional point of view, the New Deal was realized by delegating to the President (through a series of statutes culminating in the National Recovery Act of June 1933) an UNLIMITED POWER to CONTROL every aspect of the economic life.

The outbreak of World War Two extended these powers with the creation of a "Office of Emergency Management" [the ancestor of today's FEMA]. On September 7, 1942, FDR renewed his claim to TOTAL CONTROL during the emergency:

"In the event that the Congress should fail to act, and act adequately, I shall accept the responsibility, and I will act.…The American people can…be sure that I shall not hesitate to use every power vested in me to accomplish the defeat of our enemies in any part of the world where our own safety demands such defeat."

On February 19, 1942, the FDR administration proceeded with the internment of seventy thousand American citizens of Japanese descent who resided on the West Coast (along with forty thousand Japanese citizens who lived and worked there).

38 posted on 01/09/2013 9:40:55 PM PST by Katechon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14
I interpret just the mention of "executive order" as an admission by the Obama administration that there is no way on this earth that any gun control law will pass Congress.

Congressmen on the fence about this issue are now relieved of having to commit themselves. They need only state that they are awaiting the results of Obama's executive orders. If such orders prove effective, then there would be no need for new legislation.

39 posted on 01/09/2013 10:06:14 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Ours disappeared in our last move. We didn’t notice until months later — too late to file a claim. Very sad!


40 posted on 01/10/2013 6:58:34 AM PST by Roses0508
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson