Replies

Hobby Lobby has automatic standing to challenge Sonya Sotomayor’s appointment to the Supreme Court on the basis of Obama not being Constitutionally able to “act as President” according to the 20th Amendment, because Hawaii has confirmed that he has no legally-determined birth facts and therefore could never have “qualified” by Jan 20, 2009 as required by the 20th Amendment.

They can show that they have suffered particularized harm from Sotomayor being illegally nominated by a man who is forbidden by the 20th Amendment from “acting as President”. Obama has no legally-established birth facts (since the HI state registrar could not verify to AZ SOS Ken Bennett the following birth facts for Obama: male, Aug 4, 1961, Honolulu, Oahu, Stanley Ann Dunham, Barack Hussein Obama). Without a legally-established birth date, birth place, and parents, there is no way that he could “qualify”.

IOW, HI registrar Alvin Onaka indirectly told us that Obama has never qualified for office, and the only person who could Constitutionally act as President all this time is Joe Biden. Only the person acting as President can nominate SCOTUS justices. Sotomayor and Kagan were not nominated by Joe Biden and thus cannot Constitutionally be on SCOTUS.

Hobby Lobby has suffered particularized harm by Obama’s illegal “acting as President” because Sotomayor denied them a stay of the enforcement of the HHS mandate.

If Hobby Lobby attorneys have the courage, we now have the legal certification which could open this wide for them and for the country. Because Sotomayor and Kagan would be the particular subjects of the court case that Hobby Lobby could file, they would have to recuse themselves, and some semblance of lawfulness might be restored to the SCOTUS for this particular issue.

Does somebody know who the legal eagles are around here, to see if there’s anything that could be done to encourage Hobby Lobby attorneys to do this, for the sake of themselves, the freedom of religion, and the survival of this country?