Posted on 12/11/2012 1:37:12 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Over the past year, both before and since the elections, there have been a number of court cases challenging Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility. Most of the cases have been dismissed by judges for reasons that are not truly legitimate, but many feel they were dismissed to avoid the political ramifications.
Just last week I wrote about a case that was filed in Florida, that not only challenged Obama’s eligibility, but stated that he was a direct threat to the safety and security of the United States. That case has yet to be heard.
Yet another case filed in Alabama may present one of the best chances of producing a ruling against Obama. In this case, Hugh McInnish and others have filed suit against Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman for failure to properly verify the eligibility of Barack Obama. The case points out that the state constitution requires the Secretary of State to verify a candidate’s eligibility and that Chapman failed to accurately verify Obama’s eligibility.
The attorney handling this case is the same attorney handling the case in Florida. Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and the Klayman Law Firm in Washington, will hopefully be arguing this case before the Alabama State Supreme Court. The reason the case is going to the state Supreme Court is that a previous judge dismissed the case. In that case the state argued...
(Excerpt) Read more at godfatherpolitics.com ...
Given that Larry (Loser) Klayman is in charge, the answer is obviously a resounding “no”.
Nope, won’t happen.
Corruption is too deep now - everywhere.
Nothing to see here.
Move along.
Move along.
obviously not.
who knows? one of these days some judge somewhere just might decide to do his/her job?
It’s too late...and it’s not going to do any good. I think anyone can “prove” he was born here better than anyone can prove he was born in Kenya. Not that I like the man’s policies and havn’t looked into this issue (like many others) i just think it makes people who live believing it look like kooks.
If there was real factual hard evidence I would jump on the band-wagon right away.
If Obama is ineligible, he should not be POTUS. People like he and Hillary are enemies of America.
Obama and his minions would just laugh it off ,then ignore it
So if the case is won and the Alabama Sec. of State did not infact confirm his eligibility, does that them mean that Obama will lose the Electoral votes from Alabama, the one’s that he did not get?
No judge can, or will boot a sitting President from office.
That is a good thing.
No judge will boot a sitting President from office.
That is a bad thing.
Well, then, it looks like another failure then. Specifically, the term “properly”? Did the SoS follow the law, custom, and procedure for certifying those, and I mean ALL of those on the ballot? Unless you can demonstrate the SoS SPECIFICALLY violated the procedure, then it is all for naught, and will be tossed out, like the lower court did.
EVIDENCE, people. Not wishful thinking.
“There is credible evidence that Mr. Obama was not born within the United States and that his birth certificate or other identifying documents are fraudulent.”
- Larry Klayman
Subpoena his complete immigration file with DHS. A Certificate of Naturalization is proof he was a foreign national before becoming a U.S. Citizen. A Permanent Resident Alien Registration (Green Card) is proof he is a foreign national who is not yet a U.S. citizen.
Ok, faithhopecharity, tell me how, under the law, can a judge remove a sitting president?
That is for congress to do...
We don’t have to prove where he was born. Obozo has to prove he is constitutionally eligible - i.e. that he is a natural born citizen, one that was born on US soil to 2 USA citizen parentS.
When you apply for a job or whatever, you have to prove your place of birth, not the employer or the agency.
obozo has never proven his birth status. No one ever knows where the heck he was really born. We only know that he claims to be the son of a foreigner.
You are saying - we the employer asking obozo to prove his birth status to make sure he is eligible for the job are kooks;
but the idiots who DON’T question his birth status but blindly let him take the job are right in calling us kooks?
IT IS OBVIOUS - YOU ARE THE KOOK!
spread around a few bribes and these guys will be bought.
Judge could demand proof of constitutional eligibility, especially easy before a new presidential term begins (dores not require removing a sitting “president” at this propitious time)
I agree.
1. The state constitution requires the Secretary of State to verify a candidate’s eligibility.
2. The plaintiff has presented the state SOS mountains of evidences that obozo is not constitutionally eligible to be the pres, and asks the state SOS to verify obozo’s elig.
3. The state SOS ignored the evidences and did not do anything to verify obozo’s eligibility, thus violating the state constitution.
ISN’T THIS SPECIFIC ENOUGH??!
IT IS THE CONSTITUTION, STUPID. (I don’t mean you specifically, I mean all the idiots who ignore the constitution)
This is not a matter of ‘procedure’, but constitution!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.