Actually, what Onaka legally confirmed to Bennett was that the HI birth record is not legally valid. Onaka would not verify ANY of the birth facts that Bennett submitted on the application form for a letter of verification, even though Onaka did verify that those are the claims that are on the record they have. The only LAWFUL reason for him to not verify those facts is if he can’t, and the only reason he couldn’t verify them if that’s what their record claims.... is if the record itself is not valid.
Bennett’s duty was to keep Obama OFF the ballot because nobody in this country can certify that Obama is eligible. According to HI statute, that HI BC means NOTHING legally unless and until it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and the probative value is determined. Judicial and administrative persons and bodies are bound to the Federal Rules of Evidence.
IOW, without a court procedure, there is no way that Obama can qualify by Jan 20, 2013 as required by the 20th Amendment. And there is no way he EVER qualified for the last 4 years either.
This is all in the public record now. It is legally established. Every state SOS has been informed of this, by Attorney Larry Klayman. Every state AG has also been informed. Every one of them knows that Obama cannot qualify. If even one of them did the right thing this would blow wide open. At the very least someone with standing would take this to the Supreme Court. Congress is not an administrative or judicial body so nothing it does can resolve the issue of whether Obama qualifies - and the 20th Amendment says that the “president elect” can still fail to qualify by Jan 20th, so Constitutional QUALIFICATIONS for the Presidency fall to the only body left after Congress has certified the electoral winner: the courts.
SCOTUS is badly compromised. We saw that with John Roberts’ ruling on Obamacare. But if the legal facts are made known to the general public through the media and in a court hearing, it would be much, much harder for anybody to pretend that 2008 was anything but a coup by a foreign enemy combatant.
That is your personal opinion. This is a legal matter. Only if your legal opinion is affirmed by a judge, state SOS or AG would your opinion become an “actual” legal fact. That has not happened. So far I have not seen even a single lawyer willing to argue in support of your opinion and lawyers will argue any side of any issue if paid enough or motivated for other reasons, but they haven’t embraced your interpretation of what “actually” happened.
What did “actually” happen, IMO (IANAL either) is that Bennett, rightly or wrongly, interpreted the HI “authentication” by Onaka to provide sufficient legal basis to establish a claim to AZ by HI that “legal records” of some kind affirm that Barry was born in HI making Barry eligible as an NBC (under the legal theory that only US soil birth matters) and Bennett honored HI’s claim under the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.