Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

One doesn’t have to be a doper to realize that the state level is where this issue should be decided, and one must be on some brain-deadening substance to claim that the Constitution gives the Feds the authority to ban intoxicants in intra-state commerce.


24 posted on 11/28/2012 1:45:00 PM PST by Daveinyork (."Trusting government with power and money is like trusting teenaged boys with whiskey and car keys,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Daveinyork

You are correct. That’s why the author has his panties in a wad over the legal right the Fed has in curtailing interstate pot to Washington.

And is this stupid law going to reduce crime? Nope. Will pushers still be arrested? Yep.

Lets be realisitc here. This state law is a liberal wet dream. They get to pass more laws, grow the size of government AND collect more tax revenue.

And yet... there are those naive FReepers who support this nonsense.


40 posted on 11/28/2012 1:56:46 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson