Exactly! Stands to reason that the more time one has to get ineligible voters to vote, the more fraudulent and/or multiple votes there will be. Furthermore, everyone should be voting on the same day (with the exception of absentees with a legit excuse) with the same information about the candidates on hand: just a matter of basic fairness. Early voting is probably the single most important factor in election rigging by those determined to do so.
Seems that these recent election "innovations" of Clinton era and after (such as early voting, Motor Voter, same day registration and others) should never have been adopted. They were sold in a stealthy manner by lefties under the ruse that the primary objective of election "reform" should be to increase the number of votes, therefore the emphasis on convenience to voters. But the emphasis should have been and still should be on integrity far above convenience. Quality of the system trumps quantity!!!
Some of us were sounding the alarm that early voting was going to bite us.
Not to mention that we were proudly telegraphing how many votes the democrats would need to win.
Prevent voter fraud? Why would the DOP want to cooperate with that? It’s the whole point of these “innovations”.
Indeed. Thanks for the ping!
There is absolutely no rational reason why any intelligent person would want to dumb down the electorate; but we have been intimidated by the tactics of the Left--the name calling which greets anyone who wants to try to upgrade the quality of the suffrage.
We did not have any idea that universal suffrage was a positive virtue before the Jackson era. It was not seen as such the first 50 years of American independence. The whole issue needs to be thoroughly reevaluated; not just accepted because we are afraid to be called nasty names.
For more on the subject, Threat To Liberty--No Guarantee of Virtue.
William Flax