Posted on 11/27/2012 9:05:27 AM PST by patriot08
.
The truth about the Obama syndicate’s “victory” in November due to the most massive voter fraud in American history has become increasingly dire and overwhelming. It is also merely the latest treasonous act perpetrated upon We-the-People by our slave masters.
And—with the exception of the still-sycophantic Obama-media who enthusiastically embrace totalitarianism—said “win” by Obama shows how quickly he and the Marxist Democrat Party (with the help of willing RINO Senators and incorrectly named “representatives” of the people) affected the complete overthrow of the United States government…and We-the-People. If you are uncomfortable with these truths and believe that the telling of them constitutes defeatism, I suggest you stop reading now. My message will not get any rosier.
(excerpt)
Before the last stage of our options is forced into implementation, there may be a couple of things we can do to stop the complete destruction and chaotic onslaught by our once-fellow citizen leaders. The first is to file a treason complaint against Obama and see if you can find a grand jury in your state that will agree to pursue it. We only need one, at this juncture. Multiple treason complaints have already been filed by LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick III and have been accepted by the courts as “meritorious.” The second is to get to the electors in each of your/our home states and beg them, in light of the unprecedented November voter fraud, not to cast their vote for Obama until a recount is affected. This must be accomplished before 17 December 2012. Information on both of these items may be accessed at the Jag Hunter and The Electoral College—both links below.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
With Republicans now controlling a good number of the governorships and state legislatures as they do, it's time to repeal early voting in states where it exists so we can minimize opportunities for 'Rat fraud and cheating.
This year there was a lot of chatter about introducing voter ID cards, which is another good idea, but not one state legislator I know of has come forward to support the repeal of early voting in his state. What's so scary about repealing early voting? It's an open invitation for election fraud!!!
Prevent voter fraud? Why would the DOP want to cooperate with that? It’s the whole point of these “innovations”.
We’ve got a rock solid SOS in Michigan. Unfortunately we have a governor who often leaves her twisting in the wind.
The governor refused to sign the bill that put a simple citizenship checkbox on the ballot application but the SOS did it anyway. Naturally the courts blocked it right before the election.
Like our must ask ID law, people claim it doesn’t mean anything but making them sign an affidavit declaring that they are who they claim and that they’re a legal voter does help quite a bit. This citizenship check box was the same sort of deal. The affidavit is effectively a signed confession if it gets caught.
The day after the election, Obama’s de-facto DREAM act illegals protested the secretary of state for refusing to give them driver’s licenses. They claimed not having an ID made them feel like they were being singled out if they tried to (illegally) vote. SOS Ruth Johnson informed them that Obama had created their legal limbo and that they needed to take it up with him because its not her problem.
Mom, is that you?
And you say I’m the thread nag.....
"It was my intention to talk not about race, but about perceived voting irregularities," Webster said in a written statement. "However, my comments were made without proof of wrongdoing and they had the unintended consequence of casting aspersions on an entire group of Americans. For that, I am truly sorry."
Nanny. Thread nanny and notorious PITA.
Nanny, Nag, whatever. I’m sure patriot8 is quite capable of handling posting and commenting, and doesn’t need protection.
Kids these days too often get coddled and sheltered, and it keeps them from being able to think critically, to question what they read, and to research deeper than a trivial google search.
Anyway, I’ve allowed you to hijack the thread long enough. So if you want the last word, take it; if you can’t think of anything related to the actual topic of the article, I won’t bother responding again.
I just wanted to let patriot8 know I respect her a lot more than you seem to.
You truly have no idea what you’re talking about. You’re too damn arrogant and insensitive. You’re always quick to criticize and find fault. patriot08 has done marvelous research.
Let’s see you keep your word. Do not reply.
Ping for later
re: Kennedy and Chicago
Isn’t it interesting? Had he not stolen the election he may still be alive today in his 90s.
I heard/read that Webster had made some accusations. Based upon the quoted material it was general in nature with no specifics as to where, when, time, etc.
The article also cited another accusations about college students which was investigated but not found to be accurate.
Maine allows voter registration up to the election but does require some very specific identifications according to their website. So if people were registering that day they had to provide some specific ID or else the polling precinct people were lax in their duties. Otherwise they would have had to been on the voter roles or so it would seem to me.
Thanks for the link.
I read that Obama did not win any state that required voter ID. Don’t know if it’s true, but it wouldn’t surprise me.
Indeed. Thanks for the ping!
Why?
The author of the posted article from the Canadian Free Press that began this thread states in the first of her bullet points that Obama lost all four states that had voter ID laws: Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, and Tennessee. I believe I read somewhere, however, that two more states had voter ID and Obama lost both of them as well.
Intuitively, you would think that voter ID would probably cut down on the shenanigans. But you can't really prove that it did from the data at hand. Remember that Romney was supposed to win all of those states anyway, and McCain won all except Indiana, which he lost narrowly in 2008. (The guess is that none of them had voter ID in effect in '08.)
Therein lies a dilemma about voter ID laws. Republicans tend to be more supportive of voter ID, so you are more likely to get it enacted in "red" states, states that the fraudsters generally concede from the get-go. However, in the swing states where anti-fraud measures are most needed, voter ID is more difficult to pass because of strong opposition from elected Dems.
Why would you not expect much from John Fund?
PA, MI, WI, OH, VA (State Senate Tie broken by GOP LT Governor), and Fl, all have GOP Governors and legislatures. Minority democrats in those states should have no say on anything.
We also have the courts to deal with.
If only Romney looked into voter fraud, but I guess he only wants to fight with Republicans.
Ohio pings..
http://www.floridapoliticalpress.com/2012/11/10/ohio-vote-totals-for-obama-a-statistical-miracle/
Ohio pings..
http://www.floridapoliticalpress.com/2012/11/10/ohio-vote-totals-for-obama-a-statistical-miracle/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.