Posted on 11/25/2012 1:41:10 PM PST by Nachum
A forensic profiler whose previous cases have included the Natalie Holloway disappearance and the O.J. Simpson double murder says Barack Obama is confessing to stealing the 2012 president election.
“Obama appears to unconsciously confess on multiple occasions that in his secret fury he stole the 2012 presidential election – continuing his attacks on our nation,” Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., told WND in an assessment of Obama.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Simple:
You attempt to discredit a site that constantly sends us the truth by ‘associating’ it with another that is flakey.
You advance Obama’s agenda thereby.
Having the opinion that an article about some “hidden language” interpreter/author that basically reads like an advertisement to sell a book (yes I read the whole article) hardly qualifies me as someone furthering Obama’s agenda or one of his minions. It does sound like kooky c2c material (which is probably why this thread was moved to bloggers/chat), doesn’t reflect well on true conservatives, and lastly, your comment was way out of line.
He does seem to have had a weird life. He loves his power though. One day I suppose it will all come out.
Personally, I am convinced that the rats stole the election. I believe they stole the election using a very devious, hi-tech scheme of padding rat votes and (mostly) deleting Republican votes in the battleground states. They did this by spreading the fraud thinly over entire states - - a few hundred here, a few hundred there, and pretty soon you are in the tens of thousands of votes.
Flame away. I will never believe that so many Republicans “stayed home” when there was such a clear national hatered by normal, taxpaying, traditional American families for the African communist in the White House.
Scroll down and click on WND’s Big List of Voter Fraud. That’s more convincing that these mindreading techniques.
He’s a little boy playing with his cool toys. A freak got foisted upon America because the supposed adults in the Democrat party did not conduct themselves in that manner.
Difficult yes, impossible no.
Yes, the “both parties are the same” gibberish again. Sick of it.
Just a few months ago, we saw something similar happen in Venezuela. Chavez’s opponent had a comfortable 4-5 point lead in the polls. Then at the last minute, wham, Chavez won. The election was certified literally within minutes and everyone was told to go home, nothing to see here folks. At the time, I wondered if it was a test run for here.
Yeah, sounds like, if not worse skulduggery, Chavez managed to get his base to mob the polls.
Our own Rats have the cheek to accuse the GOP of “suppressing the vote.” Which actually means putting an end to multiple voting and ineligible voting. Even the socialist friendly election gurus in the UN say that would never fly elsewhere.
Reading this as far as the “one dog is probably enough” statement, and I declare this balony! Why are we making things up when we have actual facts on which to hang out hats.
And for that poster that said that nobody did anything about electiion fraud before the election, I declare that balony too. How about True the Vote? How about the Tea Party? How about all the observors we had at the polls?
Work an election once and just see how difficult election fraud is to catch. Here in Wisconsin, folks reporting election fraud had better be doggone sure about it or they’ll be the ones going to jail. And even if you catch them red handed, their vote is likely to count anyway. They may be prosecuted later, but their provisional vote will be counted if they want to pursue it.
The only way to really get a real look into the election fraud is for it to come down to ONE state, not FOUR. But even when that happened in 2000 it didn’t change a thing other than some places getting more electronic voting.
Are you sick enough of it to do something different?
>> “How about all the observors we had at the polls?” <<
.
We had zero observers at the polls when and where it counted.
And you can’t observe the false coding of the electronic voting machines. That is where the election was stolen.
This is what happens when birthers take on the election fraud question: we start to look like idiots.
I’ve seen it posted here that only Romney has standing to sue on this. Not sure that is correct. Every voter has had their vote diminished in value. And fraud is a crime, not a tort, so it seems it should be investigated completely.
What can I do?
My spidey sense started tingling when, right before the election, the Ubama team casually assured their supporters they shouldn’t get upset by early exit polls. Right then I knew something was in the air.
Massive hi-tech vote fraud... The rats have turned it into an art form.
About as much as I can do: Scream loudly often.
The Democrats are experts in vote fraud; Kennedy was elected President due to ballot tampering in Illinois and Texas. That was over 50 years ago, when there were paper ballots which were hand counted. With electronic voting and mail in and early voting, the fraud possibilities are beyond the wildest imaginings of Richard Daley or George Parr.
Good point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.