Simple:
You attempt to discredit a site that constantly sends us the truth by ‘associating’ it with another that is flakey.
You advance Obama’s agenda thereby.
Having the opinion that an article about some “hidden language” interpreter/author that basically reads like an advertisement to sell a book (yes I read the whole article) hardly qualifies me as someone furthering Obama’s agenda or one of his minions. It does sound like kooky c2c material (which is probably why this thread was moved to bloggers/chat), doesn’t reflect well on true conservatives, and lastly, your comment was way out of line.