Thanks for that. You;re right, though. I always ask what standard is being used when someone advocates same-sex ‘marriage’. They never know what I’m talking about. Then I ask, why TWO? If male/female is negotiable, why not number? Then they laugh at me and say I’m being ridiculous.
Oh well. Thanksgiving Blessings! God is good.
> If male/female is negotiable, why not number? Then they
> laugh at me and say I’m being ridiculous.
Yup. And why end there? Why not incestuous “marriages”?
Again, they’ll think it’s “argumentum ad absurdam”, and it would be, if we weren’t living in the Bizzarro Planet.