Posted on 11/09/2012 4:58:17 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2
Then what DOES it mean? To you, that is.
More than interesting.
If they cannot believe their own man would be good for the USA; does it indicate that deep inside their hearts they are beginning to realize that their chosen religion just may not be good for their souls as well?
They have been fed social and progressive programming for a bunch of years now.
The Emergent/Purpose Driven Church. Rick Warren/Joel Olstein/contemplative spirituality/co-exist movement, and it is social programming and it is very effective.
At my last church, there were three speaking engagements- in the two months leading up to the election, with social justice leaders. It is HUGE industry and wildly popular. It is all over TV and books stores and radio. And the white suburban people were mesmerized and intoxicated with the message of the plight of the poor urban black man.
The church has been taken over as well.
That is what socialists do.
If they cannot believe their own man would be good for the USA; does it indicate that deep inside their hearts they are beginning to realize that their chosen religion just may not be good for their souls as well?
When I said 7% of blacks who did not vote for Obama does not mean they automatically voted for Romney, you asked me what it means. Most Blacks who did not vote for Obama probably did not vote - at least that is what I read among Christian Blacks upset of Obama’s homo and abortion stand.
Obama had a lower turnout. Romney had a lower turnout than McCain. I strongly suspect that Obama won by voter fraud.
Look at the damage they did in New England...THREE pro-abortion, pro-sodomite radical women elected to higher office in Red Hampshire; one of them pro-Islam. Two to Congress, one is the new Governor. Then there is Elizabeth Warren...all with the support of Catholics. Can anyone explain that without using the old CINO excuse?
1. Yes
2. None of the above. All the R downticket people got my vote.
Their individual stands on certain issues may have not been to my liking, but at least the had chosen the right PARTY that mostly mirrors my concerns and wants.
Extra Credit:
Being in a Conservative (most of the time) state (Indiana), and a VERY conservative county as well (Dems hardly put up ANY candidates for local offices) my vote (non-vote) against the status quo in BOTH major parties would cause nary a recognizable ripple to disturb the Force. (Where are the threads examining what the votes for non D/R’s mean??)
(You said 8% earlier...)
#252 Around 8% of Evangelicals are Blacks. They voted their color like they always do.
#254 Black evangelicals never vote for the Republican.
Then it means your earlier posts were incorrect as I stated; for you have now clarified the 'they' to mean only 93%.
Now THIS is a statement I can hang MY hat on!
Try to find a 'hellfire' pastor preaching at a Bible-believing church in New England. Just try. Lukewarm as they come.
This aspect of the 'blame game' is total BS...it is the fault of this group; it is the fault of that group.
Here is who is at fault...the GOP nominates a candidate who was being rejected by 65-70% of Republican voters all the way thru the primary process. They leave their primaries 'open' to Democrat shenanigans. Then they are SHOCKED when a good portion of the 65%'ers don't show up on Election Day. That 'where else are they going to go?' mandate didn't sell. They stayed home. Blacks obey their plantation owners on Election Day...enough of the 65%'ers threw off their chains to keep Romney from winning. It's as simple as that.
Isnt it wonderful that the threads are ‘restored’ to normal ???
;)
One can never be brilliant with auto correct on the IPhone
Elsie you are despicable.
Get your nasty prickily a life Elsie. :)
Note: A LOT of native americans are mormon. Suggests the agenda here.
Post #187 is a direct statement that those who feared Romney because he is a Mormon (ie liberals and others) should remember that Harry Reid is too. IOWs 'if Harry Reid is OK then why isn't Romney?' You missed the point of that by a mile.
Now there is a sane post. The GOP-e lost this election and it is the GOP-e who is now running around trying to put the blame on everyone and anyone else that it can to deflect the blame from its conservative treason and maintain its hold on the GOP. Tokyo Rove is the architect of it all. Conservatives are not welcome in ‘his’ party.
Great, how about letting the other poster and me work it out if she thinks that I am wrong about her posts, I don’t want to get into an extended discussion with a third party about what is in some other poster’s mind.
Got to remind those fearful of a Mormon president of this.
You HAVE to be kidding!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.