Posted on 11/08/2012 12:19:42 AM PST by Mr170IQ
The clues:
Looking at the results from the election, it seems very suspicious that there was so little Republican turnout, even though anecdotal evidence shows that both enthusiasm and turnout was much higher this time.
The Theory:
I believe that the democrats managed to electronically drop a percentage (maybe 20%) of the votes in the republican majority precincts of the swing states. In order not to be too obvious, they dropped democrat votes as well as republican votes. This enabled them to get those absurd D+8 and D+13 numbers that the pre-election polls were using.
Proving it:
In order to prove this we would have to pick several republican precincts in swing states that showed oddly poor turnout.
Then we need to obtain the official list of everyone who voted in those precincts in this election, as well as the complete list of registered voters in that precinct. Then we would have to contact every registered voter and ask them, if they voted in the election, and if so, when and where (but not for whom).
If there is a highly-significant number of registered voters who claim to have voted, but are recorded as NOT voting, then we need to get legal affidavits from all of them, affirming that they voted, as well as where and when.
If possible, also find witnesses who observed them voting and get affidavits from them as well.
Fixing it:
From the states where we have proven that votes were being thrown out, we would need to get a judge to block the state from officially certifying the electors, or we need enough congressmen on our side to block accepting the electoral votes from those states.
Without 270 electors voting for Obama/Biden, the election for President is thrown to the House of Representatives , and the election for Vice-President is thrown to the Senate. We end up with Romney/Biden - which is a hell of a lot better than Obama/Biden for another four years.
Your plan sounds like a long, drawn out, expensive process.
We just have to accept the results and move on. However, I still feel this election was stolen.
Of course it was stolen. Very, very meticulously.
We MUST be sure this never happens again. I don’t have a clue HOW, but still..
“I don’t have a clue HOW, but still..”
It’s called ‘Run a conservative’.
We, the Conservatives, tried that...the RNC sure did us NO favors, did they?
All they needed to do was DROP the Romney vote count far enough below 0bama's, which they did and I agree. There is NO WAY the Republican turnout was LOWER than for McCain in 2008. I will NEVER believe that, EVER. It's easy to foment that lie when the final tally for Romney is a lie, right?
Thanks for posting this. I read another post here at FR which stated that 1 out of 5 Ohio votes was cast by an unregistered voter. That would be an 0bama vote, most likely. Perhaps in some states they dropped the Romney vote below that of 0bama's and in others raised the 0bama vote above that of Romney's. The former would be easier.
I've been wondering where Eric Holder's been recently. Perhaps busy in the DOJ basement, manning the liaison center for vote manipulation plotting with his plain-clothed ACORN, Black Panther, labor union and 'mysterious United Nations poll monitors' throughout the nation that night?
(National) 11/7/2012 - AMERICA'S CLAIRVOYANT ELECTION SYSTEM - Perhaps one of the oddest moments of all during last night's live election coverage was what happened to Karl Rove on Fox Network News.
With Florida still too close to call and hundreds of thousands of votes still out in Ohio (including a large hunk of votes in Romney strongholds), and with a spread of about 100,000 votes separating the candidates in Ohio, Fox called Ohio for Obama. Karl Rove arranged to come on the Fox network to voice his rebuttal.
Now, whatever you think of Rove, I think most of us agree that he's a numbers guy. His numbers didn't support the calling of the state of Ohio at that point in time. When he explained his reasoning, the Fox anchor quickly shut him down. "It's a science" he was told.
Based not on actual votes, but on projections from a single private entity, the National Election Pool (NEP), we were all told what the election results were going to be. When Rove pulled out his notes and calculations, he was basically told "Shut up, this is a science."
But is that what your vote really is? A science project, to be viewed only by experts inside a nesting set of black boxes, completely out of public view?
If we are to have real self-governance, we need to be able to authenticate each essential step in our own elections -- without need for special expertise to explain to us what the result is. What more centralized, privatized form of declaring a result is there than to commission the NEP to provide a single set of statistics to ALL of the TV networks for a declaration of results without human eyes ever looking at a single ballot.
The media called the election in Tennessee just 11 minutes after the polls closed and by the way, exit polls had already been cancelled in Tennessee because, it was explained, everyone already knew who the winner was going to be so why bother with the expense. Even the voting machines, opaque and controlled by whatever their programmers put into them, had not yet issued results printouts. Is this the new, NEW method for pretending at democracy?
Washington State, where I live, is a forced absentee state, where 100% of the votes are now absentee ballots, which must be postmarked on Election Day. I placed my ballot in the post office at 2 pm. There are no exit polls, because there are no polling places. Apparently a few phone calls now substitute for actual exit polling (to people with land lines? That's an increasingly elderly demographic). Perhaps 40% of all ballots in Washington have not even been counted yet, but we've been told the results.
In California, typically 25% of the votes are counted after Election Day, yet results have been announced. That's a million uncounted ballots in Los Angeles alone. We have no clue what is on those ballots but we've been told not to worry about it. The stats guys have issued their verdict.
Forget voting machines, programmed by insiders to do whatever they do. Let's just skip counting the votes altogether and use statistics.
I’ll never vote again until a “extreme” FAR FAR right canidate shows up.. If i hear the words “ Reach across the isle” one more time, im gonna put my hair out
If the rat fraud apparatus is now so well organized that they can arbitrarily decide how many votes to report from any given precinct, it doesn’t matter who the Republicans run. He or she would still lose.
Was 0bama's victory a sweep of ALL battleground states? WHAT ARE THE ODDS OF THAT HAPPENING? That would mean he should win nearly ALL of the states, right?
Any statisticians here? I say that's impossible and don't say it's because he made appearances there. So did Mitt.
*impossible to do without RIGGING, that is.
What really surprised ME was Mitt, being a successful businessman, already savvy in politics...why he conceded so early. Why he didn’t have a team of attorneys standing by.
I’m a Christian so I KNOW this is ALL in God’s Hands...the whole thing. The human BG says...this is NOT adding up.
At. All.
Having lived in California for so many years, I hear ya. It was “useless” to vote. OTHER THAN...it was the right thing to do, AND there were local things to vote on.
I NEVER understood why that was allowed to happen, either. Call the elections before the west coast was even done voting. (Or thereabouts...)
Nevermind.. Maybe the female ‘AROUSAL FACTOR’ with 0bama is greater than I already learned since 2008. LOL!
So, in order for the votes to be missing, they would have to disappear throughout the day -- they could not disappear at the end of the process once the votes were tallied. If they disappeared throughout the day, how was that done right under the nose of the poll watchers, clerks, and judges of elections? It's much easier to add votes than it is to make them disappear, nobody "unstuffs" a ballot box.
I find it curious myself that I hear so many stories of huge turnout, but then discover this is a low turnout election. That was not true in my precinct in 2012, where my son was the last to vote at #1538. I third or fourth from the last to vote in 2008, and I was #1414. So our turnout was about 7% higher.
I agree, it seems weird, but I still don't see how it happens under your theory.
Oh thanks for nuthin’.
I’m now going to go get sick to my stomach...and go to bed.
:)
Read your Bibles kids, get your hearts right with God...and sleep well, OK?
They announced for reelection of Obama based on their “math” and statistics. Everything that happened after that was just a formality. I take it they cheated this election... all the way.
Exactly. Additional verdict: prop 30 passed, prop 32 didn’t!
Can’t we do the treason thing instead?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.