If only you would stop showing it off !
Fascist little rooster is on notice, he will end up as Sunday dinner soon enough. The only reason he's on top of the fence crowing is because a group of people spent more than two years researching and I ended up as spokesperson trying to present what our findings were. Without that input he wouldn't have anything to crow about. Rooster would still be cockadoodling about Frank Marshall Davis seducing the teenage daughter of a friend, he would still need to maintain that she was sent to Kenya to cover the shame of a pregnancy to a coloured man 35 years older, and anyone can tell you that teenage girls don't come out of high school with the hots for an ugly old black man, but he gets a thrill out of telling it that way, because it appeals to the voyer in him. It gives reign to his dirty, impotent little mind.
And why did I start? Because I was also peer-pressured. Yes I was. I was called a subvervise and a traitor because I didn't supply names and dates and details on our research, on this forum. Tattle-tales circulated the contents of my private mails containing out-of-context brief summaries - like KISS - keeping it short and simple, and left my name on the messages.
That was followed by demands that I 'come clean' and how dare I keep any result of research a secret? Didn't I understand I had a duty...the last straw was that after all, I was only an Australian, how could I be expected to understand and care what the United States was facing...IT'S MY COUNTRY! I was told... Peer pressure.
So I attempted to commence to tell the story from the beginning. There was really no other place to start. And every statement I made, every clue I pointed out, every image I posted in evidence, was ridiculed by our resident critic, who had never posted a link, a document or a photograph, who knew nothing but to critize, who used nothing but words cockadoodle-doo! and relentlessly persued and bullied me - and caused others to remove my name from information I had provided them with, though they did retain the information itself, freepers who had been writing to me for years, quite suddenly stopped replying to private mail.
Hey, Beckwith? Remember me?
Talk about etiquette, there isn't any. There's very little common courtesy, and the one freeper with whom I had the longest, most productive FRiendship told me that I shouldn't have engaged in a p+ssing contest with her, after she circulated my private mail to a ping list she admitted was 150 long.
Were you on that list, Seizethecarp? Is that how you became so knowledgable all of a sudden? Because the person who offered to keep the material safe off-site circulated it? While we were still checking leads...
Well, it's Christmas, hope you and your loved ones have a Merry Christmas, there's a New Year coming up and it's time for me to make some resolutions. I've bought a new car, I have some health issues to deal with, I do treasure the FRiends I have made and kept on FR, but it's time for me to wind back, become less obvious, the material I refer to has been lodged with someone trustworthy for safekeeping, the effort is far from over, but what-ever I do from now on goes back to where it was always more fruitful.
Under the radar.
Again, a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year and to all good men - goodnight!
If only you would stop showing it off !
“There’s very little common courtesy, and the one freeper with whom I had the longest, most productive FRiendship told me that I shouldn’t have engaged in a p+ssing contest with her, after she circulated my private mail to a ping list she admitted was 150 long.
“Were you on that list, Seizethecarp? Is that how you became so knowledgable all of a sudden? Because the person who offered to keep the material safe off-site circulated it? While we were still checking leads...”
Fred Nerks:
As was pointed out to you several times on the Mal-Val thread, it was you, yourself, who revealed your big secret that your “researchers” were pushing Valerie Sarruf as Barry’s mom based on nothing more than a morphing video put up by Polarik.
As to my being more broadly “so knowledgeable all of a sudden,” am a careful student of your claims, which I regard to be non sequitur conclusions piled onto previous non sequitur conclusions.
To All:
Fred Nerks’ Mal-Val narrative violates numerous basic forensic principles of investigation and also violates elementary rules of logic.
Key delusional lynchpins of the Mal-Val narrative:
1. Mary Toutonghis’ 50-year-old memory of the age of her own child when she babysat a child in Seattle supports a conclusion that the babysitting event took place in January 1961, not January 1962. (Not!)
2. BHO Sr. sitting next to an Asian woman named Anne (and actually ID’d with a Japanese last name by the Cambodian, IIRC) validates a claims that BHO Sr. was married to a Filipina named Anna S. and had a child by her that was taken to Seattle in January 1961 and appeared in Polk and had her baby babysat by Mary Toutonghi. (Not!)
3. The fact that, in baby pictures, Barry resembles his half-brother David is PROOF that David didn’t exist and that Barry is actually David. (Not!)
4. The fact that a man in Ghana, Roman Obama, with the same last name as Barry happening to be within one year of Barry’s age but no factual family connection in evidence, leads by twists and turns to a conclusion that Roman is the son of BHO Sr. born in 1960 to a Filipina wife of BHO Sr. despite having no Filipino features and a total absence of evidence or testimony to any such wife or connection to BHO Sr. (Not!)
5. The fact that pictures of Barry cant morphed into pictures of Malcolm X and Valerie Sarruf supports an a priori claim that it must be true that they are his parents. (Not!)