Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TeaPartyBob

And this is why the talking point of Nate Silver and the rest of how Zero can win the electoral vote and lose the popular vote because he’s doing “well” in Ohio is a bunch of nonsense.

If he’s losing the popular vote by 3-4 points, then even if he squeaks by in Ohio he’s bleed support elsewhere, and clearly it appears to be Iowa, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Michigan, and Oregon. Holding on in Ohio means nothing if he loses even 2 of those states.

He will not win the electoral vote if he loses the popular vote by 3 or more points.


7 posted on 10/31/2012 8:11:21 PM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Truthsearcher
He will not win the electoral vote if he loses the popular vote by 3 or more points.

He will probably not win the electoral vote if he loses the popular vote by 1 or more points, and surely not by 2 or more. The polls are definitely out of synch with each other solely based on the expected partisan turnout. Karl Rove, Gallup,and Rasmussen vs. Nate Silver, PPP, and CBS/NYT/Quinnipiac, etc.

22 posted on 10/31/2012 8:27:17 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson