Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: tselatysr
>""(The) basic principle is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on; without having some real-time information about what's taking place," Panetta told Pentagon reporters."

Well explain why we blindly armed the Sinola cartel in Mexico then, Mr Panetta!

9 posted on 10/29/2012 12:27:43 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rawcatslyentist
you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on

Yes, but we already had forces in harms way and the point was to get them out - that other thing you must have read about never leaving a comrade in arms behind on the battlefield.

19 posted on 10/29/2012 12:43:39 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: rawcatslyentist

Panetta’s comments are cowardly. Risk is INHERENT when deploying forces into “Harm’s way”. He is a fool and dishonors every American soldier when he says that. The 0bama regime has ripped the spirit straight out of our soldiers by their cowardly actions. Who wants to fight for a coward? NOBODY. I guess that’s the goal here; To demoralize our fighting forces. Soldiers should WANT to go into a situation like Benghazi that night. Putting their training to good use, to KILL the bad guys and to SAVE AMERICAN LIVES. This is a dream mission for most soldiers but 0bama didn’t want his Muslim brothers to be hurt or killed. 0bama is the enemy.


24 posted on 10/29/2012 12:51:14 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: rawcatslyentist
" '(The) basic principle is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on; without having some real-time information about what's taking place,' Panetta told Pentagon reporters."

But within 30 seconds, Panetta concluded that the General in charge of our forces in the region did not know what was going on! Panetta is not that gifted, folks. This is an outrageous act--and I am not referring to the General who was clearly aware of the emergency involved.

If after taking emergency action, the General would have been shown to have been mistaken in his assessment, he would doubtless have been subject to discipline for haste. But that is not the situation. This sort of interference--deadly interference--with your commanders in the field, is the sort of thing that loses wars. If Panetta didn't understand what was going on, that is no reason to remove the general.

William Flax

26 posted on 10/29/2012 12:51:50 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson