I wonder if Doherty and Woods’ hours-long stand on that rooftop was witnessed by anyone via drone.
Ask yourself: What kind of person watches four people get tortured and slaughtered, doesn't raise a finger to help, and then flies to Vegas for a campaign and fund raising rally?
Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin!
It’s unreal to me that they didn’t send any help from our military...
There is a rancid stench of treason in the air...hanging over our nation.
An American Lament in 2012
http://www.jeffhead.com/lament.htm
They probably cheered
I had a bit of an epiphany regarding this yesterday. I think the pushing of the YouTube video narrative had a different motive than just not contradicting the “Al Qaeda is crippled” meme the administration’s been using during the campaign season.
I believe that, as the events unfolded, immediately mindful that requests for increased security had been ignored and/or denied, the thinking that evolved was “if this was due to an event that wasn’t a predictable contingency...” such as a spontaneous demonstration over a video, “... then we can’t have been expected to have been prepared for it.”
This gives them some room to indulge the fantasy that their established level of security would have been adequate if the attack HAD been a premeditated, coordinated one, because they might have received intelligence in advance to deal with it.
For the attack to have been a planned terrorist act immediately makes them accountable for having ignored all the requests for increased security, not to mention their complete blindness regarding the significance of the 9/11 anniversary.
Sources say counterterror chief reprimanded for calling Libya attack terror, White House denies
By Catherine Herridge
Published October 24, 2012
| FoxNews.com
Congressional sources tell Fox News that a top administration counterterrorism official was reprimanded by the White House last month after he testified that the Sept. 11 attack in Libya was terrorism.
The White House and the official are pushing back on the claim. But the allegation would appear to raise questions about recent administration statements that they were labeling the attack terrorism from the start.
Sources told Fox News that, in fact, the White House was unhappy with Matt Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, after his Sept. 19 comments, and told him to tone it down afterward.
Olsen had told a Senate committee, in reference to the four Americans killed in the attack: “They were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy.”
These leaked e-mails are probably coming from Hillary’s State Dept. I would bet there’s been some friction between Hill and Tom Donilon, the president’s National Security Advisor.
Donilon had no qualifications for this position. He was a lobbyist for Fannie Mae from 1999 to 2005, has zero military experience. He is, like nearly everyone else in the West Wing, a political operative.
The decisions involving Benghazi were political decisions, made by political operatives. They didn’t see the new power structure in Libya as the enemy. They obviously believed, as Nicholas Berg did when he refused security in Iraq, that their favoring of the Islamists would make everyone safe.
Benghazi is the result of Nicholas Berg foreign policy.