Oh do tell! I eagerly anticipate your explanation of how the rules of logic become a matter of "human rights" to those of us not suffering from "limited" definitions such as you.
And of course, that doesn't even begin to address your doctrinaire request to "prove a negative" when the "fact" you want proven is an inaction rather than an action.
And you wanted to know if *I* was 15?
You just keep bellowing and beating your chest as you back toward the rhetorical exit.....
you are beating and trying to explain rules of logic.... that’s pretty rich...
go to school and talk with me after you pass the bar.