Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver

Think about it.

Wheat is a seed. Basically, a type of grass seed.

And it does not benefit at all if it gets chewed up and digested. Not like some other seeds (fruit seeds) that use animals eating it to spread it around and boost the fertility.

But it does benefit wheat if it contains toxins or proteins that cause grief to anything that eats it.

If wheat grains wanted to get eaten, it wouldn’t be wheat.

It’d be a strawberry!


34 posted on 09/29/2012 6:06:08 PM PDT by djf (Political Science: Conservatives = govern-ment. Liberals = givin-me-it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: djf

Peas do the same thing ~ over time we’ve developed toxin free varieties but down in the Sahel they still keep the old nasty ones that make you go blind ~ they plant them in the bad years because they’ll grow with little water. Then they eat them and go blind


37 posted on 09/29/2012 6:14:40 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: djf

You’re talking about natural selection. By that logic we shouldn’t eat chicken or steak because if you could see cows and chickens before they were domesticated, boy oh boy. Except we did domesticate them, as we did strawberries and wheat. And we made them better, or rather harnessed their evolution to our purposes. It just so happened that when we got really good at it we also got fat for unrelated reasons.


105 posted on 09/30/2012 5:37:25 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson