1 posted on
09/28/2012 11:32:01 AM PDT by
barmag25
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: barmag25
Full title.
CONSERVATIVES ANTI-JIHAD SUBWAY AD LEADS TO NEW POLICIES: NYC AUTHORITY CAN NOW BAN ADS THAT COULD INCITE OR PROVOKE VIOLENCE
2 posted on
09/28/2012 11:33:17 AM PDT by
barmag25
To: barmag25
Ok, then let file complaints against all the various Leftist pro Obama ads because they might incite violence
3 posted on
09/28/2012 11:33:43 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
To: barmag25
Unconstitutional and SCOTUS would hopefully overturn this practice.
To: barmag25
But they will only do so against ads “hurtful” to Islam. Anything that Christians would consider “mean” will be said to “protected under the First Amendment”. Free speech is now dead in NYC.
5 posted on
09/28/2012 11:35:08 AM PDT by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: barmag25
Here we go................
6 posted on
09/28/2012 11:35:26 AM PDT by
V_TWIN
(obama=where there's smoke, there's mirrors)
To: barmag25
or interfere with safe, efficient, and orderly transit operations. . . .
Soon the trains will run as smoothly as they did in Mussolini's day.
7 posted on
09/28/2012 11:37:05 AM PDT by
Genoa
(Starve the beast.)
To: barmag25
any images involving the above person can incite me to violent convulsion resulting in projectile vomiting or dry heaving combined with momentary tourette's
it should be banned
8 posted on
09/28/2012 11:37:22 AM PDT by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: barmag25
Sharia has arrived.
If Muslims will be violent (D’oh!) you can’t say it.
First Amendment be damned.
10 posted on
09/28/2012 11:38:23 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(You didn't build that. The private sector is doing fine. We tried our plan and it worked.)
To: barmag25
... the MTA reasonably foresees would incite or provoke violence... So the Metro Transit Authority, bureaucrats who can't make a train run on time or turn a profit, are now the arbiters of what constitutes free speech. I wonder if they will don black robes when they render their verdict?
11 posted on
09/28/2012 11:40:44 AM PDT by
Never on my watch
(I can see November from the Chick-Fil-A drive through lane.)
To: barmag25
14 posted on
09/28/2012 11:43:45 AM PDT by
timestax
(Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
To: barmag25
So the MTA will ban anything offensive to Islamists and approve attacks on any other religion, and anyone contesting this will have to assemble a pattern over time to prove discriminatory application. It will take time and money to fight the decisions and the attorneys will get rich. Sounds like the usual way to impose de facto censorship.
16 posted on
09/28/2012 11:44:18 AM PDT by
Truth29
To: barmag25
so, all one need to do is to claim “the ad caused me to be violent” and by that standard the ad is guilty
were the MTA a private enterprise - it’s not, it’s a government agency - I’d have no problem with them making any advertising rule they want
as a government agency, they must meet the standard that the government cannot abridge freedom of speech, at least not without “just cause” (yelling “fire” in a crowded theater) but, judging in advance how someone might react to an advertisement with violence is always a subjective and political judgement that any U.S. government needs to stay out of
18 posted on
09/28/2012 11:44:40 AM PDT by
Wuli
To: barmag25
So this means all election campaign posters and signs too? Every time I see an Obama 2012 bumper sticker or sign, I become very “incited” and “provoked”. I don’t suffer fools graciously.
19 posted on
09/28/2012 11:45:05 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Proud to be a 53 percenter American.)
To: barmag25
Are they just afraid of the Muslims?
22 posted on
09/28/2012 11:49:33 AM PDT by
stanne
To: barmag25
I feel some violence coming on. If it'll finally get some of these idiotic MSM Left-wing sh*tbags off the air...
"Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander."
24 posted on
09/28/2012 11:51:12 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(I will not comply.)
To: barmag25
Anti-blasphemy laws managed by the Mullah Transportation Authority.
25 posted on
09/28/2012 11:53:05 AM PDT by
andyk
(I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
To: barmag25
So I guess they’re saying that muzzies have tendencies toward violent reactions.....
26 posted on
09/28/2012 11:57:08 AM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Happy to be represented by Lt. Col. Allen West)
To: barmag25
And the lesson learned is that violence works.
27 posted on
09/28/2012 11:57:27 AM PDT by
Drill Thrawl
(I can haz CW 2 now?)
To: barmag25
Who would have thought that New York would be the first to fall to Sharia.
I always figured Detroit.
31 posted on
09/28/2012 12:06:45 PM PDT by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: barmag25
I guess that means no Republican campaign ads............
32 posted on
09/28/2012 12:20:39 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Is it just me, or is Hillary! starting to look like Benjamin Franklin?.................)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson