Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: grundle

That’s all well and good, but the fact is that a vote for Gary Johnson is NOT a vote AGAINST Obama.


2 posted on 09/20/2012 8:07:03 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jocon307

Funny that people get po’d about all the lying the O admin does and then right here on FR people keep saying that a vote for someone other than Obama is really a vote for him. Unless you can show how the vote for anyone else gets counted in the Obama tally, actually adding to his overall total, please stop embarrassing yourself and the rest of the thinking people here.


5 posted on 09/20/2012 8:14:14 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307
That’s all well and good, but the fact is that a vote for Gary Johnson is NOT a vote AGAINST Obama.

In the context of this conversation, it really doesn't matter. It allows the Obama caller to have to defend his positions and actions in a way that doesn't permit attacking Romney.

It's absolutely brilliant, imho. Well done and executed!

The next step should be to enter that dialogue into whatever program was used to develop this exchange about Quantitative Easing and post it on youtube.
7 posted on 09/20/2012 8:17:09 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307

“That’s all well and good, but the fact is that a vote for Gary Johnson is NOT a vote AGAINST Obama.”

That’s your opinion.../s

Just to ensure, I understand your statement is...a fact.


14 posted on 09/20/2012 8:22:49 PM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307
a vote for anyone other than Romney is a vote for bammey....

so nice phone conversation, but beyond that, you're part of the problem....

43 posted on 09/20/2012 9:28:29 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307

Do these people, who insist on voting for a guy who is going to lose, live in swing states?

There’s NO WAY Johnson is going to win.


44 posted on 09/20/2012 9:34:02 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (Hello OWS? We don't need a revolution like China's; China needs a revolution like OURS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307

“That’s all well and good, but the fact is that a vote for Gary Johnson is NOT a vote AGAINST Obama.”

It’s a vote FOR Johnson. You ever hear about actually voting FOR someone?


58 posted on 09/20/2012 9:50:38 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307

I had a fraud of a college professor who taught a communications class. Every time you brought up facts to counter her far left proselytizing, her response was ‘uh-huh, and that’s your view.”

One of my favorites was when she said “the only reliable nbewscasts are the BBC and the PBS because they don’t take no money from business.”

Yes, this was really a college professor speaking in poor english. The first week of classes, she talked about her master’s degree and also told the class that she’d be getting a doctorate, quoting here, “If I can get someone to pay for it.”

Anyway, one day she handed us this crap about how PBS “don’t take no money from business” and I stood up, having worked for a PBS affiliarte, and told her she was just wrong—both PBS corporate and PBS local stations all take hordes of money from businesses. Her response? “Uh huh, and that’s your view. But PBS don’t take no money from businesses.”

I made an appointment with her boss, the dean of the department, and presented her an srticel from the New York Times—hardly a conservative screed—that said that PBS national had earned more than 100 million dollars in the most recently available year of statistics. Hardly “not taking no money from businesses.”

So it doesn’t surprise me at all that someone with a similar political stance would refute facts with “that’s your opinion”.

“Fact” is actually an acronym according to what I was taught in J-school. It stands for “Fast, Accurate, concise, True.”

How sad that a college professor doesn’ tunderstand that.


76 posted on 09/21/2012 1:53:00 AM PDT by VideoPaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307

I hate to be a wet blanket, but a vote for the GOPe will just get us more of the same gruel. I have no doubt Mitt will be elected without my help. I also have no doubt he will just “do what he has to” and we can just pound sand. Thanks, but no thanks. Before you get on your high horse I carried a “Sore Loserman” sign around for DAYS. I have just had enough of politicians saing what they feel they need to to get elected without ever even sighing a breath of the truth. Where is Mitt telling the countr what deep kimchee we are in? Oh, he can’t cuz folks wouldn’t vote fer him. But he WILL be able to pass all sorts of “ememrgency measures” when “The Music Stops”. Count on it. Weapons confiscation will just be part of it. The libtards will be able to blame it all on the GOP, too.


79 posted on 09/21/2012 3:01:40 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson