Posted on 09/19/2012 3:03:58 PM PDT by oliverdarcy
A professor at the University of California recently gave a middle school presentation in which he claimed the earth has “too many people” and proposed a reduction of the population through “vegetarianism” and “controlling human fertility.”
Professor Richard Cardullo, a professor of biology at the University of California – Riverside (UCR), told a group of seventh grade students that the environment’s well-being was in jeopardy “if we don’t do anything about population.”
“If we want to decrease our population, we can do it through any number of ways,” he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at campusreform.org ...
Guess it works, hunh?
Correct me if I’m wrong, but if an MD is incompetent or malicious, there’s an authority that takes away his license to practice medicine, isn’t there?
Shouldn’t there be the same sort of organization for college professors?
Abortion is the most efficient birth control. Every year one million babies go into the oven and never come out alive.
Best of all for the promiscuous mother and nitwit dad, our philosophers and artists make the heartless slaughter a sacred human right and celebration of freedom.
It’s a guilt-free way to keep the population down.
Great idea, reduce the number of unwanted or accidental children, reduce the number of baby killings.
Must have valid permit to have a child signed onto by the mother and father. Stiff penalties for pregnancy without license, no abortion until penalty or jail time is served. Babies born under these circumstances to be put up for adoption.
I have fathered 5 children and none of these rules would have stopped me because my wife and I knew what we were doing and we wanted all of these kids.
What we really need to do is spread western style feminism to the third world.
Not too many western countries with a replacement population of native born people.
Feminism will solve the overpopulation ‘problem’.
[/sarcasm]
The Western World is controlling their own population, dramatically. It’s the Turd World hellholes which need immediate and dramatic “population control”. Especially the muzzie filth.
Sadly what you say is true. Feminists have few children.
Well, Professor Cardullo, I can think of one human too many right off the bat. But bats are messy. Think in your case I’d use a rope.
I rounded.
There is a science to approximating but that is another thread for another day.
Another solution: tie injectible or implantable birth control to welfare benefits. If you cannot feed your family, house them or take care of them, the female head of household and every female between 12 and 42 living there receive a Norplant injection. The contraceptive implant comes out when you no longer use food stamps, Medicaid, Social Security Disability, Section 8 housing or other welfare programs.
No abortions. No forced adoptions. Dependent population growth, most illegitimate births and most teen pregnancies are prevented.
Return to the work force, you gain the right to have kids. Or if you are married to a man who works, and no longer require welfare benefits, then you can have the implant taken out.
In his student days, the birth rate for Iran was about 5 per family, but it has collapsed since then, and Iran is now below replacement level too I believe.
Dear Professor :The next time you decide to take a long hot bath remember it’s a triple dose of sleeping pills washed down with wine & the razor blade goes “Down the Road “ not “Across the Street”. Lead by example you socialist shitstain!
ugh
Some FReepers should parrot their words and launch the Liberal Suicide Project website...
heh
There is a science to approximating but that is another thread for another day.
You wouldn't be an engineer by chance? I attended an engineering college when your personal calculator was made of bamboo, was 10" long, and had 3 1/2 digit accuracy. One of my math classes included "estimating" (approximating) and significant figures.
My quibble wasn't with the "rounding" but the magnitude was off by three orders of magnitude on the land area of Texas. They have ranches bigger than 270 square miles. The actual population density was "close enough for government work."
Regards,
GtG
LOL!!! I meant 270,000 sq miles. I thought I used the “K” to make it in thousands.
Hey, my rounding was only off by A THOUSAND (that’s my story and I’m sticking to it).
Thanks for checking my figures. I have messed up before when doing a similar calculation — that is why I showed my work.
FWIIW: France is about 210,000 square miles (smaller than Texas). We could put all the population of France in the DFW Metroplex (14,500 square miles). But WHY? The last thing we need here is a bunch of lazy, smelly frogs.
Are you suggesting that their government mandated "one child" policy which also includes forced abortions and sterilization has nothing to do with it?
Ya might wanna reconsider that.......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.