[Joseph Harrolds]

...and posts an antagonistic comment,

I disagree with your characterization of my comment as "antagonisic". I attacked no one.

[ShadowAce]

I, personally, did not take it as antagonistic. However, due to your status as having signed up here just yesterday, I would be doubly--or triply--careful as to how you word your comments.

You have no history for the mods to go by to ascertain your true intentions, to determine whether a comment was just stupid, or intentionally antagonistic.

Just some food for thought.

[ZX12R]

I disagree with your characterization of my comment as "antagonisic". I attacked no one.

Your comments have not been antagonistic. You just gave your honest opinion, which caused alarm in some of the more ambitious religionists that stand watch here. You'll be fine, if you are sincere and a conservative leaning noob.

[plsjr]

I think a reasonable person would see the validity of my opinion.

It seems TheFreeDictionary does too:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/antagonistic

antagonistic [ænˌtægəˈnɪstɪk]
adj
1. in active opposition
2. mutually opposed

I did not assert you attacked anyone, I merely made (an obvious) observation.

[plsjr]

I think a reasonable person would see the validity of my opinion.

It seems TheFreeDictionary does too:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/antagonistic

antagonistic [ænˌtægəˈnɪstɪk]
adj
1. in active opposition
2. mutually opposed

I did not assert you attacked anyone, I merely made (an obvious) observation.