Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

County Taxpayers Question Land Bank
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 8/10/2012 | Audrey Spalding

Posted on 08/13/2012 8:20:30 AM PDT by MichCapCon

No one likes to see a building sit vacant. Vacant buildings deteriorate, can invite vandalism and discourage those considering moving to a neighborhood.

If a building is tax delinquent for a number of years, it can be taken by county government, which then takes up the expensive task of maintaining the property until someone purchases it.

So it is surprising to see that before its upcoming tax auction Kent County acted directly to keep vacant properties from being sold to private individuals.

On July 12, the Kent County Board of Commissioners voted to hand more than 40 properties over to the Kent County Land Bank to prohibit private individuals from bidding on those properties first. Moreover, that came at the expense of taxpayers: The Kent County Taxpayers Alliance reports that the land bank spent nearly $500,000 to buy those properties.

Though the ostensible purpose of land banking, which has exploded in Michigan in recent years, is to revitalize neighborhoods beset by vacancy, Michigan land banks have broad powers that can be misused and abused. Land banks have the ability to borrow money, hold vacant property indefinitely, funnel tax dollars toward chosen projects, and, as highlighted in Kent County, the ability to circumvent the tax auction process.

The only reason a land bank would need to circumvent the tax auction process is if someone wanted to purchase the properties in question. This makes the county and land bank's action doubly insulting: Taxpayer dollars are being used to thwart the sale of vacant property to people who hoped to do something productive.

While government land banking is relatively new in Michigan, the state of Missouri has a much longer history with the practice. A review of the St. Louis land bank's practices found that the 40-year-old land bank had a history of rejecting legitimate offers and allowing elected officials oversized influence over who could buy property. These practices have not led to success. The St. Louis land bank has amassed more than 10,000 properties since its inception.

Sadly, Kent County seems to be mimicking some of the same operational problems observed in the St. Louis land bank.

In May, MLive published the list of properties the land bank hoped to acquire and the land bank staff's comments justifying the acquisition. The staff comments below are excellent examples of land use control by ownership and prioritizing increased land bank revenue over private entrepreneurship.

Land use control by ownership: 1007 E. FULTON: “Beat Goes On” record shop. Staff comments: Good example of what the Land Bank can do to keep undesirable business out of neighborhoods. Party store wanted to move in.

Prioritizing land bank revenue over private entrepreneurship: 2796 64TH STREET SW: Staff comments: Near bike trail, hot area. Revenue from this project will go a long way to help fund the Land Bank.

The Kent County Taxpayers Alliance has rightly called out the land bank's actions as "crony government gone wild." The alliance has put together a radio ad decrying the move, and an informational issues page. Regardless of the land bank's motivations in this case, the powers it flexed in July have the potential to be greatly abused.

The Michigan Legislature acted foolishly when it gave such broad powers to land banks.

Hopefully, work by groups like Kent County Taxpayers Alliance will at least bring some transparency to actions that have little to do with protecting taxpayers and end up hindering private development.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: landbank

1 posted on 08/13/2012 8:20:42 AM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

thanks for posting, will forward to Michigan relatives....


2 posted on 08/13/2012 8:30:29 AM PDT by nevermorelenore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Springman; Sioux-san; 70th Division; JPG; PGalt; DuncanWaring
The evacuation of Michigan will be enforced.

If anyone wants to be added to the Michigan Cap Con ping list, let me know.
3 posted on 08/13/2012 8:40:05 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon
No one likes to see a building sit vacant. Vacant buildings deteriorate, can invite vandalism and discourage those considering moving to a neighborhood.

Au contraire, mon ami! Vacant buildings are the new Obama regime's "living quarters of the future Obamaland."

Friends, relatives, the occasional junkie, gangbanger can gather together to 'redistribute' the collective fortune of the masses. The only addition to the accomodations will be mail boxes where each denizen can receive their weekly 'government check.'

4 posted on 08/13/2012 8:50:29 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson