it wouldn’t interest you very much that he reduced the projected cost of putting it on in essence saving the taxpayer now would it?
_________________________________________
Well it would have been interest5ing if it were true..
but would it interest you very much that he spent 50% MORE of the the projected cost of putting it on in essence billing the taxpayer for unnecessary frills that had nothing to do with the Olympics ???
TWO YEARS before the Olympics Willard had already spent $1.3 BILLION of OUR money...
Hes real good with spending other peoples money...
On the Olympics he spent like a drunken sailor...
Hes never had to budget like a normal “peon” in his life...
The Olympics gig was just for an entry in his political resume...
and boy does he push it...
I suppose everyone is entitled to their own facts. How could he have spent that money two years before the Olympics when he left Bain at the end of 1999? That would mean he would have had the whole 1.3 Billion in his pocket before he left Bain. So tell me, just how did he spend OUR money two years before when he only quit Bain two years before?
Still, your argument that implies that Obama is better than Romney is just plan vaporous of intellectual capacity.