Yeah. Right. Here's a message to the UN:
Posted on 07/26/2012 12:18:07 PM PDT by Kfobbs
The American response to any gun-grabbing from the U.N. or Mordor-on-the-Potomac will be the same response given to the British on April 19th, 1775, at Lexington and Concord.
I believe your response is the correct one. Obama will go through all those steps and as you correctly state,we simply have to ignore them. This is the line in the sand! Obama and his marxist/islamists thugs cannot realize their ultimate goal of mass genocide upon this Nation,unless they take away our God Given Right to bear arms. Any law Obama signs to the contrary has to be refused and ignored!
Excellent post! Thanks!
Yeah. Right. Here's a message to the UN:
Exactly who’s UN forces are going to try this! ;-)
Let’s see:
(1) I don’t answer nor do I recognize the UN or it’s power over me, a US Citizen and Commissioned Officer of the US Army.
(2) Even though I do take my orders from those superiors above me, I have taken an oath to defend the US Constitution.
(3) Presently, I am not in active service and have resorted back to my US Citizen status within my residence of the state I live in.
Therefore, any United Nations jackboot thug enforcers that come into my community and even into my yard to attempt to enter my home to strip away by force your guns, your rifles will be met with military application of force!
That’s right boys. I’m the general operating this M4 gas operated rifle with a f***ing purpose!
It’s never going to happen. There’s no federal agent in his right mind that’s going to attempt to enforce this illegal administration and any foreign law. I’m not saying we need to ignore this either. We need to write our senators and representatives and say - you better stop it at your level - or be voted out. If it comes to armed revolution, then we have done that before as a fledgling nation - we can do that again as well.
Sure, they can have them. Bullets first! Then I might not need them afterwards depending on the outcome.
Mine start at .22 and go to .50 up to 3200fps. I wonder if they want to play catch.
Back in October, 1835, there was another tyrant trying to do the same thing (they never learn). The response is the same as the Texans of yesteryear said to Santa Anna: “COME AND TAKE IT”
Here here — I second that!
Excellent point!
They’d best bring a lunch. It’ll be a damned long day.
Indeed. One such document states that any and all treaties require a 2/3 majority in the Senate to ratify. That will never happen.
Also, the Constitution trumps any treaty if Obama decides to do an end-around and ink his signature on it. Cause for impeachment right there.
Lastly, there is enforcement. UN troops coming door to door to get guns? Are they mad?
Apologies for the double post...
http://digitaljournal.com/article/318690
Op-Ed: Obama signed ACTA in violation of Constitution, say critics
Christine
By Christine Mattice
Jan 29, 2012 in Politics
8 comments
In signing ACTA, President Barack Obama has again leapfrogged over the U.S. Constitution, critics charge. The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) was signed by the United States and several other countries on October 1 with little fanfare.
In wake of the recent uproar (and subsequent shelving) of the proposed United States’ bills SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect IP Act), however, many Americans are now turning their fears toward ACTA.
I hope they don’t force the local cops, who I like, to try to enforce this.
Maybe everybody NEEDS to get a gun now, with sufficient bullets for at least self protection, but via personal sales with no paperwork, rather than from a gun shop, where it can be traced back to a buyer. It’s apparent gun ownership is on the chopping block, and there is a saying I’ve heard, but can’t recall, something to the effect, “if gun ownership becomes criminal, only criminals will have guns”. (At which point, we will all NEED a gun.)
Senator Coats,
I’m sure I’m not the only one writing you today about this topic. Apparently, it’s being reported that Obama will circumvent the will of the U.S. senate and the nation concerning the UN Arms Treaty (UNAT) that would in effect disarm America’s Second Amendment rights through possible future amendments. If Obmam agrees to the UNAT and there is no ratification vote taken up in the democratic controlled senate. The U.S. Senate holds the key, and even though there have been at least 58 U.S. senators who have affirmed that they will reject the arms treaty if American civilian firearms are included. It doesn’t matter what’s included. If Obama does this he needs to be impeached immediately. We, the US Citizens of the United States of America do NOT answer to the UN or any other foreign power. That was the whole ordeal during 1775-1783 called the American Revolution. As a commissioned officer of the USA Reserves and former OIF veteran - I am applaud that this is even being considered. I do hope you and other senators will express and take action against the UN and Obama in this matter. It’s treasonous to say the least!
My letter to my Senator...
That is not a sentence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.