To: Sir Napsalot
“Global warming” is science after all. Political Science.
To: Sir Napsalot
Ah I see the author of the study Jon Miller is continuing the liberal meme that global warming is now to be called climate change. As a GenXer...I say Mr. Miller, you’re a fraud and we don’t really care too much for frauds.
3 posted on
07/23/2012 11:22:58 AM PDT by
ebersole
To: Sir Napsalot
Wow, I agree with them on something.....whatever!
4 posted on
07/23/2012 11:23:22 AM PDT by
NRA1995
(I'll cling to my religion, cigars and guns till they're pried from my cold dead fingers!)
To: Sir Napsalot
It appears that donations to the Sierra Club are down.
5 posted on
07/23/2012 11:28:18 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Without the Second Amendment, the other twenty-six will cease to exist.)
To: Sir Napsalot
I'm not sure that this theme...
"You'd be concerned about global warming climate change if only you weren't a drooling moron."
...is going to do much to rally the masses.
6 posted on
07/23/2012 11:30:11 AM PDT by
chrisser
(Starve the Monkeys!)
To: Sir Napsalot
Longitudinal Study of American Youth Since when is Gen-X considered 'youth'? I'm a 42 year old woman with two grown children. (one married) And I'm a 'youth'?? People born in '61 are in their 50's now. How is that 'youth'? Talk about condescending BS.
7 posted on
07/23/2012 11:30:55 AM PDT by
Marie
("The last time Democrats gloated this hard after a health care victory, they lost 60 House seats.")
To: Sir Napsalot
"...Even with most of the country mired in a historic drought, a spate of storms that left millions without power in the mid-Atlantic, and seemingly more frequent natural disasters..."
Maybe them there GenXers figured out that weather has nothing to do with Global Warm, er, "Climate Change"
8 posted on
07/23/2012 11:31:37 AM PDT by
frankenMonkey
(will do graphics for food...)
To: Sir Napsalot
Even with most of the country mired in a historic drought, a spate of storms that left millions without power in the mid-Atlantic, and seemingly more frequent natural disasters, people have better things to worry about than global warming, according to a new study of Generation X-ers, writes Jason Koebler of USNews.
My critical thinking skills go into hyper drive when I read things like this. Call it a "spidey sense".
Right off the top, what is the historical context? How many times have millions been left without power? And the big one, what is this "Seemingly" crap?
9 posted on
07/23/2012 11:36:47 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Sir Napsalot
Gee, we were first warned back in the late 1980’s that global warming was going to doom us all in a couple of years. Nothing’s happened. Are we supposed to be scare for our entire lives?
11 posted on
07/23/2012 11:41:28 AM PDT by
MNDude
( Victimhood is the Holy Grail of liberalism)
To: Sir Napsalot
Nuclear Holocaust, drug resistance diseases, the Rapture, famine, overpopulation, polution, ozone hole, global cooling, global warming. I’ve been told all my life the world is going to end tomorrow. Really, after nearly 50 years of this crap, how can I take any of this seriously?
To: Sir Napsalot
The group is uninformed about the causes, unconcerned about the potential dangers, and doubt it is happening, writes Hank Campbell on the blog Science 2.0.Whew!! I was getting concerned that the leftists were beginning to back away from their propaganda hoax!! Thank God the Sierra Club isn't letting it go - we still have some leftists left to ridicule!
13 posted on
07/23/2012 12:06:51 PM PDT by
DustyMoment
(Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
To: Sir Napsalot
Nice to know I am a “youth”. I am a member of natal class of ‘62 which means I was taught about THE NEXT ICE AGE.
Since actual measured degrees of warming or cooling or ocean rise or glacier retreat or...never mind, has not induced panic the green loonies have redefined the terms of the debate to property damage, power outages, and lives lost.
They cannot lose based on those metrics since population increases and government incentives to live in disaster prone areas will continue to boost those numbers.
But then isn’t that exactly what they want? Less property, less power, and less lives?
To: Sir Napsalot
As a Gen-Xer I can safely say that having grown up thinking that a Soviet nuclear missile was going to explode above our heads any minute and turn us to dust, it's hard to get worked up about the slight possibility that the temperature go up a couple degrees over the next century.
16 posted on
07/23/2012 12:38:48 PM PDT by
apillar
To: Sir Napsalot
According to The Generation X Report...the demographic group born between 1961 and 1981I thought that the Baby Boomers were born up through '65, and beyond that was Gen X?
My birth year falls in that time frame, and I'm having an identity crisis right now.
To: Sir Napsalot
Even if the “threat” was real, most of the USA is a cold barren tundra 6 months of the year. So it is always going to be a hard sell for them. The thought of not-so-cold winters is not an unpleasant thought.
21 posted on
07/23/2012 1:39:33 PM PDT by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Sir Napsalot
LOL....you can fool some of the people some of the time, Jonny Boy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson