Top Romney Advisor all in for Obamacare Implementation

scottfactor.com ^ | 07/10/2012 | Gina Miller

[Louis Foxwell]

Better the devil we can destroy than the Judas we cannot.

[VeniVidiVici]

I think the same way about 120,000 IRS agents.

[cripplecreek]

“Obamacare” empowers the HHS secretary “to do certain things that are clearly aimed at trying to move us in the right direction.”

Yeah that's what we need. More government empowerment.

[G Larry]

What an ignorant declaration!

HOW do you believe you/we can destroy Obama, but are helpless to control Romney?

Leavitt is NOT running for President and Romney won’t have dictatorial control.

Only with a Romney victory will we have sufficient control in the House and Senate to modulate the President.

Obama has proven he is unconstrained by the Separation of Powers.

[Diogenesis]

Mr. RomneyCARE has been VERY SILENT about ObamaCARE
and now we know suddenly know why.
And it is NOT because Mr. RomneyCARE was honest.

Mr. RomneyCARE SHOULD have spoken up this weekend.
but he is busy hiding, planning more STATISM.

[xzins]

However, since the horrendous John “Quisling” Roberts Supreme Court decision to uphold the clearly unconstitutional “Obamacare” monster, I have decided to go ahead and vote for the Republican nominee, no matter who he is, even the liberal Mitt Romney.

Let me see if I got this logic straight: "Because a beltway insider, GOP-E judge, John Roberts, betrayed us conservatives, I will therefore get even by voting for the GOP-E candidate."

It's that kind of ignorance that's gotten us to this point. Sheeesh...

[cripplecreek]

These moderates are openly laughing at conservatives at this point. Just the other day a pro Romney analyst on FOX shrugged and said the south will vote for Romney no matter what he does.

[mike_9958]

I love it when I see people post on FR to disenfranchise conservatives from voting for the Republican nominee.

I often wonder if they are DU plants on FR. I mean really, it is a good strategy to make conservatives feel that they would be voting for Obama-lite in order to get them to stay home.

The motto is: ANYONE BUT OBAMA. Honestly it isn’t that hard.

[P-Marlowe]

We need to have a REVOLT at the GOP Convention.

Romney must not be allowed to be the nominee.

ABR

[WXRGina]

Let me see if I got this logic straight: "Because a beltway insider, GOP-E judge, John Roberts, betrayed us conservatives, I will therefore get even by voting for the GOP-E candidate." It's that kind of ignorance that's gotten us to this point. Sheeesh...

Perhaps you have a better idea than to go ahead and vote for the sorry Republican nominee? Vote for Obama? Oh, wait... I'll bet it's Ron Paul for you.

There is nothing "ignorant" about the line from the column you quoted.

I originally was going to write in someone who is actually conservative instead of voting for Romney. I suppose you would say that is "ignorant" too--voting my conscience. You may not even realize that our elections are likely just a sham. We will know for certain if Obama "wins" reelection.

[Diogenesis]

Here are two free clues.

Mr. RomneyCARE is not even the GOP candidate yet,
despite his cheating, backstabbing, changing rules
after the fact, demanding delegates actually BOW
to him and his RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE/DeathPanels.

Mr. RomneyCARE will NEVER be the conservative candidate.

[Diogenesis]

[WXRGina]

I love it when I see people post on FR to disenfranchise conservatives from voting for the Republican nominee. I often wonder if they are DU plants on FR. I mean really, it is a good strategy to make conservatives feel that they would be voting for Obama-lite in order to get them to stay home. The motto is: ANYONE BUT OBAMA. Honestly it isn’t that hard.

Maybe you did not actually read the column above past the headline. There is nothing in that piece to "disenfranchise conservatives."

You might take a moment to read it and understand it. If Romney is the nominee, he will have to be watched as closely as the next fake conservative. This piece is just that--information about what he is doing, who he is gathering around him.

And, since I am the author of the piece, I can assure you, I am not a mole for the communist Left.

[P-Marlowe]

Perhaps you have a better idea than to go ahead and vote for the sorry Republican nominee?

I didn't know the Convention is over. When did the GOP Officially give Romney the Candidacy? Who the hell is is VP Pick?

Romney managed to steal the elections by being the only Liberal in open primaries in which independents and democrats who had nothing better to do gave him the edge over the conservatives.

Romney is a knee jerk liberal in an empty suit. He has no core convictions. He is no friend of conservatives.

He got the nomination by lying about the conservatives in the race and then when he wrapped up enough delegates his handlers shook the etch a sketch.

Sorry but Romney will never get my vote.

[cripplecreek]

[WXRGina]

Yep!

[cripplecreek]

If Romney is the nominee, he will have to be watched as closely as the next fake conservative.

LOL and then what?

[WXRGina]

I didn't know the Convention is over. When did the GOP Officially give Romney the Candidacy? Who the hell is is VP Pick? Romney managed to steal the elections by being the only Liberal in open primaries in which independents and democrats who had nothing better to do gave him the edge over the conservatives. Romney is a knee jerk liberal in an empty suit. He has no core convictions. He is no friend of conservatives. He got the nomination by lying about the conservatives in the race and then when he wrapped up enough delegates his handlers shook the etch a sketch. Sorry but Romney will never get my vote.

I agree with your sentiments about the fake conservative Romney, but the column repeatedly says "IF" he is the nominee and "IF" he wins the White House. This is simply a "for your information" piece about Mike Leavitt, a man who is very close to Romney.

[WXRGina]

LOL and then what?

Why should we roll over and play dead just because there is ultimately nothing we can do to "control" these "leaders"? Why should we not watch them and let them hear from us when they [insert infraction here]?

That line you quoted was my trying to explain to the commenter the purpose of this column and that I am not a member of the Democrat Underground.