[xzins]

However, since the horrendous John “Quisling” Roberts Supreme Court decision to uphold the clearly unconstitutional “Obamacare” monster, I have decided to go ahead and vote for the Republican nominee, no matter who he is, even the liberal Mitt Romney.

Let me see if I got this logic straight: "Because a beltway insider, GOP-E judge, John Roberts, betrayed us conservatives, I will therefore get even by voting for the GOP-E candidate."

It's that kind of ignorance that's gotten us to this point. Sheeesh...

[cripplecreek]

These moderates are openly laughing at conservatives at this point. Just the other day a pro Romney analyst on FOX shrugged and said the south will vote for Romney no matter what he does.

[P-Marlowe]

We need to have a REVOLT at the GOP Convention.

Romney must not be allowed to be the nominee.

ABR

[WXRGina]

Let me see if I got this logic straight: "Because a beltway insider, GOP-E judge, John Roberts, betrayed us conservatives, I will therefore get even by voting for the GOP-E candidate." It's that kind of ignorance that's gotten us to this point. Sheeesh...

Perhaps you have a better idea than to go ahead and vote for the sorry Republican nominee? Vote for Obama? Oh, wait... I'll bet it's Ron Paul for you.

There is nothing "ignorant" about the line from the column you quoted.

I originally was going to write in someone who is actually conservative instead of voting for Romney. I suppose you would say that is "ignorant" too--voting my conscience. You may not even realize that our elections are likely just a sham. We will know for certain if Obama "wins" reelection.

[Yashcheritsiy]

Let me see if I got this logic straight: "Because a beltway insider, GOP-E judge, John Roberts, betrayed us conservatives, I will therefore get even by voting for the GOP-E candidate."

Bububububububububuh don't you understand???? OUR socialist is better than THEIR socialist!!!!