The popular culture bombards our teen-agers with the message that pre-marital sex is expected of them; that everyone's doing it (all the cool kids, that is).
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
I don’t appreciate the use of the term “teen sex”, as there is certainly nothing wrong with a couple of responsible 18 years olds geting married. Depending on what is being described, extra-marital relations (”sex” being best reserved to denote the two sexes, male and female), loose behavior, unnatural acts, etc.
2 posted on
07/09/2012 9:44:12 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("Stronger. You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid! "--Eros, Plan 9 From Outer Space)
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness;
Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
The popular culture bombards our teen-agers with the message that pre-marital sex is expected of them; that everyone's doing it (all the cool kids, that is).
4 posted on
07/09/2012 9:54:46 AM PDT by
trailhkr1
(That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence - Christopher Hitchen)
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
The popular culture bombards our teen-agers with the message that pre-marital sex is expected of them; that everyone's doing it (all the cool kids, that is). Pre marital sex has always been going on. Nothing new. We just hear about it more today through media and people are more open about it. Some of the stat's of the early 1700's was 30-35% of births would have been out of wedlock except they got married.
5 posted on
07/09/2012 9:55:19 AM PDT by
trailhkr1
(That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence - Christopher Hitchen)
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Nat Geo still pushing the ol’ Margaret Mead crap for going on eight decades now...
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Another featured 15-year-old Australian tart Cassie Osborne and her teen-aged girlfriends, wearing barely-there dresses, practicing their sexual flirtation, looking forward to becoming some young blokes boy toy.Modern slang is not my forté, but isn't a "boy toy" by definition a male object of affection - not the object of affection of a male?
Regards,
15 posted on
07/09/2012 10:38:34 AM PDT by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinarily good evidence.)
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
National Geographic...don’t they conduct those underage sex safaris to Thailand?
17 posted on
07/09/2012 10:44:41 AM PDT by
miserare
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
One segment introduced viewers to the Kreung people of Cambodia, who build love huts for their teen-aged daughters to have pre-marital sex with as many teen-aged boys as they like. Well seeing as how the world isn't exactly overrun by Kreung people, maybe - just maybe - this is a technique the tribe uses to increase its population as fast as possible.
But hey, why should a publication called "National Geographic" be expected to consider such a socio-anthropological explanation?
20 posted on
07/09/2012 3:01:08 PM PDT by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: CHRISTIAN DIARIST
21 posted on
07/09/2012 3:47:45 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson