Posted on 06/28/2012 8:27:25 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
The Supreme Court upheld Obamacare. A close read of the actual language reveals that the individual "mandate" applies to any "applicable individual" which is defined as anyone other than...(a) certain religious exemptions, (b) people in jail (they already get free healthcare), or (c) read carefully....
"(3) INDIVIDUALS NOT LAWFULLY PRESENT. Such term shall not include an individual for any month if for the month the individual is not a citizen or national of the United States or an alien lawfully present in the United States." SEE: 26 USC 5000A(d)(3)
Meanwhile, Obama just ruled by executive edict that immigration laws would be ignored for a vast array of illegal aliens, and work permits issued, thus technically making them "lawfully present"
So, basically, we just got told that we are going to be giving full health insurance for free to illegal aliens...
Nice huh?
Today the Supreme Court has ruled the the Constitution is only a Historical Document, that no longer means anything.
We are now into out fourth year of a Dictatorship.
They're on their way already folks!
Essentially, given the whims of executive orders, a President could apply this law to the entire population of the world...as long as they could get to American soil, they can be covered.
So maybe we should all renounce our citizenship and then sneak back in.
How disgusting that our SCOTUS has gone along with the dismantling of our country and the outright theft from the legitimate citizens.
The illusion of freedom is gone.
(a) Requirement to maintain minimum essential coverage
An applicable individual shall for each month beginning after 2013 ensure that the individual, and any dependent of the individual who is an applicable individual, is covered under minimum essential coverage for such month.
1) In general The term applicable individual means, with respect to any month, an individual other than an individual described in paragraph (2), (3), or (4).
(3) Individuals not lawfully present
Such term shall not include an individual for any month if for the month the individual is not a citizen or national of the United States or an alien lawfully present in the United States.
(4) Incarcerated individuals
Such term shall not include an individual for any month if for the month the individual is incarcerated, other than incarceration pending the disposition of charges.
It started in 1913. If they can tax you more for not having children, then they can tax you more for not having health insurance. Strike the root.
This should fly in the face of the liberal's favorite 14th amendment.
We just paid for all those illegal votes to keep him in. Welcome to ObAmerika.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.