That’s what the company faces. When your market changes you adapt or you die. Breastaurants are very popular and make a lot of money, that money is money not being spent in other places, either restaurants without a lot of cleavage.
There’s no reason for her to compensate her. The direction of the company changed but she was still welcome to be a part of it. Had she stayed she probably would have seen her income rise (more customers spending more money generally equates to more tips), she chose not to. He shouldn’t compensate her for her repercussions of her decisions. He would be getting on with his life except she’s suing. She should be getting on with her life, there’s still plenty of non-breastaurants in the world for her to work at.
That’s just baloney. This employer participates in setting standards in the industry. Would he reduce expenses by no longer washing dishes if his competitor across the street did? Show me a study that concludes that a restaurant can’t survive unless it looks like a whorehouse.
This lady invested years of her life in this business. She is fully justified in refusing to be treated like a whore and if the transition caused by her employer’s sudden decision to play pimp causes her some losses, she’s got a valid claim as far as I am concerned.