Just for the record, Obama’s lawyers never argued that revealing his original birth records would be an embarrassment to him. I once spent no small amnt of time searching for the link to such a statement/filing, and came up empty handed. After that, I noticed that any time the quote was mentioned, it included no link.
No one would be more delighted than I to prove that Obama’s lawyers made such a statement. The link doesn’t exist, however, because it never happened.
“Just for the record, Obama’s lawyers never argued that revealing his original birth records would be an embarrassment to him.”
They most certainly did. That arguement it would be an embaressment, an undue burden and expense was used in the first elibility case that was brought in PA by Philip Berg in 2008. Obama’s attorney just argued it would be an undue burden and expense to have discovery in the case “Voeltz v. Obama, et. al.” which is in progress in Florida.
There may be some confusion there. In 2008 when Philip Berg, Esq. challenged Obama’s eligibility, two statements were issued. One was from Howard Dean, then head of the DNC. I don’t remember who the other was from. One of them said releasing Obama’s birth certificate was “problematic”; the other said it would be “embarassing”.
Just for the record go here.
No one would be more delighted than I to prove that Obama’s lawyers made such a statement.
Your delight, my pleasure.
"Still, the source told WND confidentially the motivation for withholding the original birth certificate was political, although the source refused to disclose whether there was any information on the original birth certificate that would prove politically embarrassing to Obama."
Obama's Birth Certificate Sealed
Your statement is blatantly FALSE!