Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney, she affirms it’s ANYBODY. BUT. OBAMA.
The Right Scoop ^
| June 20 2012
| The Right Scoop
Posted on 06/20/2012 4:34:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Sarah Palin says that Obama did not respect the balance of power in the federal government when he issued his executive order last week on immigration, that he is now just telling Americans what he deems best by fiat. It was so blatant that she also suggested that we go back and talk to some of his former students because its clear Obama doesnt understand our constitutional process.
She was also asked about criticism that she didnt mention Romney in her speech at Right Online. But her reason was simple, that it would have violated the ground rules based on AFPs legal status as a non-profit. But she makes very clear where she stands and said that if the vote were had today, she wouldnt blink in voting for Romney over Obama and maintains shes always held the position of anybody but Obama.
Watch below Video at link:
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012election; election2012; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; palin; romney; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 521-531 next last
To: ScreamingFist
This would be considered common sense on any other conservative forum. FR seems to be the only "conservative" forum where we must watch the Mormon haters rage on......just saying. Absolutely. And the ultimate irony is that this imperviousness to reason that defines the FR He-Man Mitt Haters Club is the least conservative quality a person can have.
To: ScreamingFist
Well, I guess you two dumbasses can go vote for.....Sarah Palin..... Keep on sneering, huckleberry.
102
posted on
06/20/2012 6:32:31 PM PDT
by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: South40
To: Finny
I know what I'll be voting FOR if it's O v R. I'll be voting FOR making the road as rough and overwhelming as possible for whichever statist wins, Obama or Romney, and I'll do that by voting third party at the top of the ticket in order to split the vote into a plurality so the winner is still opposed by a majority.Well, there ya go. Go vote for Sarah Palin along with the other two dopes.....we're now up to a grand total of...three.
To: NoLibZone
I trust Sarahs judgment. Dont you? I trust my own more.
105
posted on
06/20/2012 6:33:05 PM PDT
by
Finny
(A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
To: Linda Frances
Mormon haters? You are pulling the religion card like the liberals pull the race card. Call names when you dont want to talk about the truth. Distract, so people stay away from Real subject. Romneys liberalism. Anyone who claims that Mormon-hatred is an insignificant part of the Romney-bashing here on FR is either stupid or a liar.
To: ScreamingFist
(four, if she were running...)
She’s not running though. That is the problem.
So I’m voting for Mitt.
To: unkus
I think 0bama has his own dismal record to be worried about. Right. Dismal vs. dismal. Obama to worry when there is NOTHING to outshine him?
Barry would be plenty worried with NEWT, PRO Constitution PRO Conservatism and the record to prove it. A God fearing candidate vs. a godless one. Good vs. evil.
To: Ingtar
Voting for Romney is consent. :)
I’ll do what I can to prevent a Marxist, avowed enemy of our country from getting another term.
109
posted on
06/20/2012 6:34:48 PM PDT
by
unkus
To: kegger8r
Yall just go ahead and keep bashing our candidate. Y'all just go ahead and keep bashing conservatives who are looking beyond ABO as "Obama lovers." Maybe Romney will magically transform into a conservative. lol.
110
posted on
06/20/2012 6:36:27 PM PDT
by
Finny
(A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
To: Timber Rattler
Keep on sneering, huckleberry.No problem goofball, by my count, votes for Sarah Palin are up to....5....on this thread. Have a nice day.
To: South40
She did NOT endorse romney!
And I hardly doubt she lost you when she supported McCain - that's theatrics. She was loyal to her commitment. Is that so unique to you that you can't understand it?
To: ScreamingFist
Wait, so now someone doesn’t even have to disagree with Romney to be a “mormon hater”, they can just object to your slandering other FReepers, and then they are a “mormon hater” too?
To: ScreamingFist
Apparently....ANYONE BUT OBAMA, is too hard of a concept for you to understand. Apparently, the consequences of handing a landslide to liberal Romney are too hard for you to contemplate.
114
posted on
06/20/2012 6:40:06 PM PDT
by
Finny
(A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
To: Finny
Everyone here understand the 2013 prez won't be a conservative - the object is to have a Republic left at the end of 2016. You think a CHicago muslim hack is the best hope, you have serious delusional issues, bud.
To: Finny
Everyone here understand the 2013 prez won't be a conservative - the object is to have a Republic left at the end of 2016. You think a CHicago muslim hack is the best hope, you have serious delusional issues, bud.
To: ScreamingFist
I call it like I see it too, and you are a presumptuous fool who uses the same tactics as the race hustling liberals.... just saying :)
To: Finny
I’ll go on record as (far) preferring Romney win over Obama.
HECK yes. 100%!
Though I would have much, much preferred Palin.
To: DoughtyOne
Any party that nominates these people, is not interested in my vote anyway.BUMP!!
To: presently no screen name
You've been called a troll by the screamer. It is blatantly wrong to do that.
120
posted on
06/20/2012 6:43:18 PM PDT
by
Marcella
(God wouldn't vote for Romney so I won't, either.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 521-531 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson