Posted on 06/18/2012 6:47:07 AM PDT by jenk
Hey ya'll come to Lansing, there'll be plenty of vaginas.
This whole controversy disgusts me, but hey, it's part of the reason why I'm not a Democrat.
The false narrative that the media is running with on the vagina controversy in Lansing is basically what the Democrats say it's about. According to female Democrats, women are being censored on the House floor for daring to say the word vagina.
So, in order to really really get those evil male Republicans to pay, the women plan to talk about taking mirrors to view the female genitalia, how the hair feels, orgasms, and on and on and on. And at no time will they suggest that any of this is a social taboo.
As a man commented on one of my posts, if a man talked about his penis the way these women are going to talk about their vaginas, he would be arrested for assault and taken away.
It's pornographic. And if you don't want to hear it, they are going to yell it, and force it, and make you.
Now let's talk about rape.
Every woman who is in her 40's knows that the phrase, "No means no," is a slogan that has been used to raise awareness of date rape. Every one of us.
And might I add, if Lisa Brown was interested in using "anatomically correct medical terms," to describe what she views as an assault on her religious views, she would have said "uterus" instead of "vagina." Not to mention that Judaism is not a pro-choice religion, but a proud pro-life religion.
So, when Lisa Brown said, "interested in my vagina," and "no means no" on the House floor, how did she expect the men to take that? And why is it that men's feelings have to be ignored? To them, she suggested they were abusing her, or wanted to abuse her, why do they have to sit there and act like they deserve to be talked to that way? They represent women too, most of them have wives and daughters. It's the day after Father's Day! They barred her for speaking for a day, big deal, did she learn? NO.
Now, we have a bunch of scared media types suggesting that this will end poorly for the Republicans. Why? Because they expect a modicum of decency?
I expect decency in government, but when a whole slew of women say they speak for me, and then bring themselves and the rest of their sex down into the gutter, I've got something to say about it.
I wonder if the female Democrats, or the rest of the Democrat Party in Michigan wish to hold the play in their local senior center? How about at the kindergarten? Try it at a mosque, synagogue or parish.
I wonder if the female Democrats take offense at being viewed only as vaginas? There is a facebook event inviting all to come to the embarrassment titled, "VAGINAS TAKE BACK THE CAPITOL!"
If you allow men to look at you as a vagina, you have set back women's rights a thousand years.
Abortions are legal in this country, much to my disgust, but look at what happens when you try to make them safe and rare. The women of the Democrat Party revolt.
It occurred to me that the women in the Democrat party are so interested in sticking it to the men who run the House, that they are degrading themselves and the family to make a point.
And what is the point?
Money.
This whole sick charade is designed to gin up emotional shouting women to give to the Democrat Party.
The issue began to address abortion on demand, Brown made it a religious rights issue, and now the vulgarity will be on full display at the nation's capitol.
Stay classy, Democrats.
Disgusting Michigan Female Democrat Lisa Browns Dishonest and Vulgar Mouth
Lisa Browns Zombies Mustve Learned From Her
I Don't Hate Lisa Brown Because She's A Woman
Unfortunately tests are racist...
I am not trying to be inflammatory, but are you suggesting that women’s suffrage is a bad thing?
I’m a woman, and I rather enjoy my right to vote. I’m also very conservative and opposed to abortion and the flagrant inappropriate use of the word ‘vagina.’
Women’s suffrage brought us women like Sarah Palin, too.
I’m curious as to what your intended point is here, and I enjoy polite discussions about these kind of things.
The dialog exchange:
Frank: Nice beaver!
Jane: [producing a stuffed beaver] Thank you. I just had it stuffed.
I did. I don’t think we need that. We can discuss the issue without it.
LOL!!!!!!!
‘Make me a sammich, woman!!’
Oh, you have vaginas running your state, too?
Attempting to turn West Point over to the Brits may have had something to do with that.
Oh, you have vaginas ruining your state, too?
fixed it.
And make it a footlong.
I think my post 27 answers your question.
I apologize; I had not read 27 yet when I replied.
I misread the headline, I thought it said: “Vaginas Demand a Lansing”.
Sand. Lots and lots of sand.
He saw what you did in your post, too!!!
GENERALLY women voters can be swayed by emotions, particularly fear mongering.
Democrats have mastered fear mongering and racism (Outlaw killer weed because it might cause a black man to look at a white woman).
So TO THE DEGREE THAT woman can be manipulated into voting against the long term survival of the country, yes, Suffrage was bad.
This is NOT to say that many, if not most women are good and reasoned voters, nor is it to say that all men are wonderful voters.
Unfortunately for every Sarah Palin, there are a dozen Maxine Waters, and for every Reagan a dozen Kennedys.
What we really need is a way to detect sociopaths and remove them from the levers of power, and a test for rationality for voters.
Of course, somebody somewhere would claim that’s racist.
Some man should have told her that he would not touch her vagina with a ten foot pole.
Lettuce be real...another double standard with many women in general(not you).. Women get upset with the word c**t but women have no problem calling men a d**k, the c word equivalent...and hey,not a single f**k is given. Another version of if a man get's his privates cut off it's national joke but if it happens to a woman it's a tragedy..
Have seen it on this site...
I was down in Wiliamsburg a couple of weeks ago, and got to see Benedict Arnold close up as he dressed down the arrogant and stubborn Colonials:
It was great! He was shouting at us and I could see spittle coming from his lips, his face was turning red, an his horse was slavering as though it had run a long distance without rest (Don't know what THAT was about)
The only thing missing was the whiz of a musketball that slapped him in his chest...:)
Yes, Arnold tried to do that for interesting reasons.
If you should visit West Point, visit their museum. There's a small corner dedicated to the decisive battle at Lexington and Arnold's action in that battle.
The American General in charge was typical British, sitting on a hilltop overlookng the battle field ... watching over Arnold who was under orders to stay on that hilltop. Arnold, however, on his horse, was witnessing the rout of American forces down below; so he jumped his horse over a fence and rode in to lead American men in a charge on the British headquarters -- he was a fighting leader, the men knew that and loved him for it, and they won that battle in a bloody way ... Arnold's blood included ... Arnold refused to have his leg amputated and limped forever after ... while continuously being screwed over financially by American politicians ... the lousy types. So he changed sides.
You'll find Arnold's story in Kenneth Roberts books: "Arundel" and "Rabble in Arms."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.