Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter; LucyT; Fred Nerks; Brown Deer
Dear David: I know you’re not doing it on purpose, but nevertheless you’re completely, 100 percent misrepresenting my post to you. Please go back and read what I said again more carefully. I did not make the points you think I did, but I did make a very important point that you have yet to acknowledge.

Nonsense.

Your comments are all like this--lots of smoke, no fire. You tell me what specific elements of your posts I am misrepresenting; what point you made I didn't respond to.

This is just a wrap up whine to me where you walk away with a general "it ain't so"; respond to nothing; and ignore the substance of the analysis.

In the meantime, you duck me but want to keep beating up on everybody else.

For example, in your #156, you say: They are positing that an established female teen member of an island community could suddenly disappear and no one would notice or comment on that fact. I.e.: SAD attended Mercer High for several yrs. No one has ever gone on record saying SAD informed them of plans to skip her senior yr. In fact, everyone on the record says just the opposite.

But the people pushing the particular conspiracy noted in this thread say otherwise. They claim SAD disappeared off the face of the earth, and not one single solitary soul on Mercer Island thought to comment on that fact.

First place, this all happened fifty-two years ago. The average class age (based on 18 at graduation) now is 70 years. Half the class is dead.

And Mercer Island, and the High School were not a community in the late 1950's as you suggest. In fact, the first class (1959) was admitted to the high school in the fall of 1957 as juniors and it was the only full class in the school.

Mercer Island wasn't a community either--there were only a few people on the entire island--most of the South half of the Island was fairly undeveloped--it was woods.

These class pictures Fred produces are classes from feeder schools that include people who ultimate went to school at the High School--but no one has any real clear idea where Stanley went to her Freshman or Sophomore years in High School.

And you are talking about a person who was not part of the mainstream of the class. Many people who were in the school at the time didn't remember she was there at all. We have one French club picture from what appears to be her junior year that appears to be real. She wasn't anywhere else in the school that anyone remembers or has any record of.

The people supporting the fairy tale have manufactured some pictures by putting her image into pictures of events that did happen--but Stanley was not there.

So now you need to find some individuals in their seventies to step up into the line of fire and say they have clear memories that she was not there as a senior.

No, she wasn't the girl who was pregnant at or before graduation.

It really doesn't surprise anyone who thinks about it that no one except the committed partisans remembers anything about her one way or the other.

And for the most part, people here are not saying what you try to have them say--they aren't saying she wasn't there; people are saying there is no evidence that she was there. The stuff you point to is all committed Liberal Barry supporters burnishing the memory of Stanley--they aren't fact witnesses.

Further, the Mercer Island High School issue is a red herring. Whether she was at Mercer Island in 1960 is really irrelevant to the analysis. The earliest date at which she would have undertaken her role as Barry's Au Pair was mid summer of 60, a month or two after graduation.

And the current view of the facts I am on suggests that in fact she made her deal with his parents a year later in 1961 and that he was in fact probably born in the summer of 61. Whether she graduated from Mercer Island or not is irrelevant.

I don't know where you get the GED degree stuff--there isn't any evidence that she got a GED. The fact that ultimately the University of Hawaii admitted her as a Freshman in 1963 is a pretty good indication that she graduated from High School somewhere. Since Hawaii isn't willing to give you a reliable record of her academic history, you don't know where but you can expect that she graduated from High School.

In looking at the scope of your posts, you look like a Barry supporter here to attempt to respond to some of the obvious disconnects in the story of Dreams. You give away the born in Kenya point--everyone knows that the guy in the White House was not born in Kenya. You give away the obvious fraud and corruption in the state of Hawaii but everyone knows that the public officials in the state of Hawaii are corrupt and are authenticating fraudulent documents to support Barry's position.

Instead, you want to defend what are the real weak points in the fairy tale.

There isn't any evidence Stanley was in Hawaii before 1963. Barry tells us that when he was two (1963), he went to Indonesia. From 1963 to 1966, Stanley was a full time year around student--no record of a child; her mother wasn't taking care of a child either.

The husband of one of Barry's Cousins tells us in the Weekly, long before the fictional conversation with Charlette that there was no baby living on Capital Hill in Seattle in 1961.

Lia the housemaid tells us that Stanley didn't have Barry when she came to Indonesia in 1966 either--that record has been conveniently terminated with Lia but from what she did say, it looks as though Stanley really never got custody of Barry in Indonesia until 1968.

Stanley wasn't his mother.

Looks to me as though you are here on a hole plugging effort for the opposing forces.

183 posted on 06/16/2012 12:39:58 PM PDT by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: David
the University of Hawaii admitted her as a Freshman in 1963... There isn't any evidence Stanley was in Hawaii before 1963.

Not true. The University of Hawaii transcripts indicate she was taking classes in the fall of 1960.


188 posted on 06/16/2012 1:27:39 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: David

So every one who disagrees w you is working for Obama?

Everyone whose posts you misrepresent is working for the other side?

Plesae run through the evidence one more time, that indicates I am working for Obama. That is a unique charge. I’ve never heard it before. You are the first. Please lay out that case w a bit more clarity and a few more details.

Thank you in advance.


190 posted on 06/16/2012 1:54:22 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: David

here's a snip, I will not post the entire page for obvious reasons. The moment I put it up, the article will dispappear.

203 posted on 06/16/2012 2:36:46 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: David; Fantasywriter
"In looking at the scope of your posts, you look like a Barry supporter here to attempt to respond to some of the obvious disconnects in the story of Dreams."

Fantasywriter an Obot? With all due respect, if you're even entertaining such a notion, you obviously are not familiar with FW's position (copious posting history readily available) on the "Obama" eligibility question and what constitutes Natural Born Citizenship.

243 posted on 06/16/2012 9:40:02 PM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson